Forrester Research have just released (expensive) reports on how many people in the US and in some European and Asian countries are using social media. Forrester has their own classification of different kinds of users – “creators” actually upload their own content, “critics” rate or review other peoples’ content or contribute to wikis and discussion forums (which could be said to be creating, really), “collectors” tag content and use RSS, “joiners” are active on social network sites, “spectators” read, listen and watch user-generated content, and then there are the “inactive”, who, well, aren’t using social media at all. Their overall conclusions are that there are less and less “inactives” – but also that Europeans are adopting social media at a far slower rate than Americans. This widget’s kind of fun to play with to see the differences:

Why do you think Europeans are so much slower? Americans had a head start on access to technology, but surely that’s evening out by now? I actually think a major reason is Europe’s language barriers, that effectively slice Europe up into many very small media ecologies. With only 4.5 million people speaking Norwegian, the tipping point is hard to reach in Norwegian social media – although more and more people are certainly using social media here in Norway. We have very little or no contact with other European countries’ social media – barely even with Sweden and Denmark.

Another possibility is that Viviane Serfaty was right, and that blogging is a peculiarly American form, akin to the diary-writing of the Puritans. For the Puritans, Serfaty wrote, working through your everyday and religious doubts, feelings and choices by writing about them in a diary was an ethical necessity and very spiritual work. In Scandinavian Lutheran societies, on the other hand, the population was taught to read the bible but writing was seen as unnecessary for peasants. Further south, European Catholics had a more direct relationship with God, in spoken prayer and hail maries and penances. I don’t know enough about religion to know whether this is a completely tenable theory (I mused about it here, though, on page 7), but it’s an interesting thought. Serfaty was writing about blogging in particular, but perhaps one could look at all social media as similarly confessional and personal and so such cultural differences might continue to hold true?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

17 thoughts on “fun widget showing how many people are using social media in various countries

  1. Mathias Klang

    RT @jilltx widget showing how many people in different countries use social media -but why so slow in Europe? http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  2. Bronwen Clune

    Interactive widget looking who is using social media across different countries. http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  3. media140 Worldwide

    RT @bronwen Interactive widget looking who is using social media across different countries. http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  4. Viktoria Disenvall

    RT jacoutoftheboxHow many people are using social media in various countries — http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  5. Omer Rosenbaum

    I do not really think that you can compare Europe as a whole to the US or even have inter comparison between European countries. Sweden with its long tradition of journalism grasp blogging quite good while it is a little slower on social network and microblogging.
    On the other hand, I can say that Sweden as well as Israel that I know from living there, localized many social network platforms successfully due to the fact the they had a unique language spoken by no more than 10 million people worldwide.

  6. Ellen

    But remember that Scandinavia has a rich culture of autobiography, and especially hybrid forms of writing that merge fiction and autobiography, starting with writers like August Strindberg, Selma Lagerlˆf, Victoria Benedictsson, and Norway’s Knut Hamsun. And of course Ludvig Holberg’s essays and epistles from the early 1700s are highly personal and idiosyncratic–and very blog-like. There are other early modern examples, like Leonora Christine’s Jammers Minde. I think it would be wrong to imply that the Nordic countries are somehow more reticent about publishing personal, essayistic forms of writing than other national cultures. Hamsun, for example, wrote numerous essays that were published in the popular press, and he is by no means exceptional in this.

    I just gave a paper on Hamsun’s “performative biographism” this weekend, so this is a topic that’s very much on my mind right now. I do know that literature and social media are quite different things, but since you are speculating about broader cultural trends I thought it might be helpful for me to comment.

  7. Ken Leon

    jill/txt » fun widget showing how many people are using social … http://bit.ly/VeNRc

  8. remotedevice

    RT @jilltxt widget showing social media behaviors by age, country, gender http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  9. Noxi

    [fun widget showing how many people are using social media in various countries] http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  10. Hege Folkestad

    On writing peasants:

    ‘In Scandinavian Lutheran societies, on the other hand, the population was taught to read the bible but writing was seen as unnecessary for peasants’.

    Jostein Fet, in his book ‘Skrivande b¯nder'(‘Writing farmers’), sums up 18th century (Danish-)Norwegian policy by saying that writing should only be taught (’til alle og enhver, end og de fattigste b¯rn’ – roughly translated: ‘to each and every one, even the poorest children’) when parents demanded and pupils read properly and knew their bible history. In spite of little entusiasm on the government side, and reluctance on farmer side (stylus, board, paper or ink had to be paid for by parents) he documents how a conciderable proportion of farmers still knew how to write, and how they left behind exchenged letters, diaries (‘chronologies’) and other material.

    In this, I assume that ‘farmers’ were probably better off than ‘peasants’, but then again, if I remember this correctly from school, the Norwegian categories do not correspond directly to those further south in Europe. Peasants were relatively fewer, and farmers were relatively poorer (especially in the west), often barely clinging on to a piece of land. Among them, my grandfather wrote down thoughts, incidents, social affairs, news etc in a ‘Chronologie’ that incidentally rings not unlike some blogs. No comments-function, though 😉 Would have loved to hear his response to my comments…

  11. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Thanks for the points about Scandinavian autobiography and personal essays, Ellen – and I love the term “performative biographism”, I had’t realised Hamsun wrote in that way. Serfaty was only writing about American culture, and my speculations about what I’ve perceived as Scandinavian slowness to adopt blogging and social media, and the skepticism to the confessional and personal style often seen in blogs, are highly speculative. It’s useful having these counter-examples.

    Hege, I’m not an expert on early Scandinavian literacy – I heard a talk by Arne Apelseth, who wrote his PhD (UiB, 2004) on “Den lÂge danninga : skriftmeistring, diskursintegrering og tekstlege deltakingsformer 1760-1840” – he said that Scandinavians became writing-literate a century after they became reading-literate, because the church saw an early need to teach people to read the bible but not to write. I haven’t read the whole dissertation, and it sounds as though it’s a little more complicated than what I gleaned?

    Sounds like looking for cultural reasons why Europe lags behind the US in social media is hard to do?

  12. Ellen

    Danish scholar Jon Helt Haarder more or less invented the term “performative biographism” and has links to most of his articles on his website here: http://www1.sdu.dk/Hum/jhh/index.html

  13. IMAP | Daily Digest for August 31st

    […] Jeff Watson RT @jilltxt widget showing social media behaviors by age, country, gender http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422 [#]. […]

  14. eli bjørhusdal

    @BerntFlekke Ikkje akkurat det, men denne er litt fin http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422

  15. Kristine

    Don’t we lag behind the US on most things? I often feel like that it takes a decade for trends from the US to reach these Northern shores, and about half the time for trends from the UK to do so. I know it’s an exaggeration, and the time lapse has decreased, and is still decreasing, due to globalisation, but if you look at social media, and especially blogs, that timeframe is not that far off. I remember Neil McIntosh wrote something like ‘in 2006, UK media finally disocovered blogs, only five years after our readers’ (just quoting from memory). 2000-03 was certainly when my UK friends got all blog crazy. Too my mind, 2008 was the year blogs really started to be recognised by mainstream journos and editors in Norway (of course, a few discovered that way earlier, but somehing seemed to shift last year: more editors and journos blogging, and with Twitter, around New Year/early 09, more and more media folks seemed to get that social media was about conversation.

    As for history’s impact on blogging culture there are certainly cultural differences, but I find Norwegian blogs to be much more confessional and personal than say UK blogs. Language may play a role in why Europeans were so slow here though, but if that’s the case it would be fair to assume that the UK was way ahead of the rest of Europe in this department. Fascinating subject!

  16. Jill Walker Rettberg

    You’re right, Kristine, we do lag behind, although the time lag is decreasing… I think you’re right that 2008 was a watershed year for Norwegian general recognition of blogging and social media – I spent most of that year on maternity leave and when I came back I felt like everything had shifted – suddenly it was called social media, suddenly there were hundreds of experts on it, and suddenly even the people who still didn’t quite know how it worked knew that they SHOULD know how to use it. A huge shift.

    The most popular Norwegian blogs are way more personal and confessional than the most popular US blogs. Which does rather destroy my argument about puritanism and diaries…

    I wonder if the UK really was way ahead of the rest of Europe? Hm.

  17. […] RT @jilltxt widget showing social media behaviors by age, country, gender http://jilltxt.net/?p=2422 [#] […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.