Students in our Remix Culture class are currently honing their research questions – next week they’ll have 250 word project descriptions and a video trailer posted to their blogs. Almost all the students are well on their way, but it’s not always easy finding the way from that first intuitive fascination with a topic or an artefact to defining a research question and planning a course of action. This part of the process can be hard work – often it’s far easier to think of six other possible topics than to commit to one!

So let’s look at one way in which that initial fascination might be focused. To our group’s great amusement, last week Kurdin showed us the fake trailer for the second Titantic movie – the one where they find out that Jack is still alive and fish him up from the depths of the ocean, frozen into a block of ice but still alive. But how on earth will he adapt to the 21st century – and the realisation that Rose is dead?

OK, so you have the fascination with this artefact – where could you go from here?

First, find some context. When you google the title of the video you’ll see that the fourth or fifth hit is to the blog The Trailer Mash: Movie Trailers, Recut. Titanic Two the Surface is clearly not an isolated phenomenon. OK, so a research project could examine the whole genre, which the blog tells us is called trailer mashups – what characterises trailer mashups? Do they tend to be critical of the movie, to parody the movie or pure appreciations of the movie? What’s the history of this genre? Did it exist before internet sharing and video editing became easy?

Next step: what’s been done on this topic academically? Google Scholar is a very easy place to start hunting. Try searching for “trailer remix” or “trailer mashup” or if the results aren’t great, add movie to the search terms. Perhaps try searching for the title of Titanic Two the Surface, just in case someone actually wrote about it. You’ll see that there is some mention of this genre in scholarly articles, but not a lot – which actually means it’s a promising field to explore.

What might adjacent scholarly fields be? Well, we talked about fan fiction in an earlier class – and this could certainly be seen in the light of fan fiction. So search for scholarly articles and books about fan fiction, maybe adding in the search term “movie”. Henry Jenkins’ book Textual Poachers is a classic in this field – unfortunately it’s currently on loan from the University of Bergen library, but you could reserve it if you’re quick. Another field that would be interesting is movie mashups in general. You could simply start with the Wikipedia article (though for a research article you need to go further than Wikipedia! Encyclopedias are starting points for research, and not OK as sole references.) and follow references and ideas from there. Googling “movie mashup” you’ll see one of the first hits is a Wired article on how Hollywood is actually starting to commission mashups – which might lead you to thinking about the relationship between the movie industry and fans.

I still haven’t suggested a specific research question – that would be up to you, if this were your topic. But hopefully you’ll see ways in which you can flesh out a fairly vague idea and figure out which direction you would like to explore further. You’ll need to read more (and look at more trailer mashups) to finalise your research question, but just from this much, you might have an idea already of which aspects would interest you most.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “how to get from a cool but vague idea to a 250 word research project description

  1. Omer Rosenbaum

    I must say that I follow your course’s description and I am totally envy of your students. While I am struggling here with the philosophy of social science you touch the hardcore stuff.

  2. […] Talk a bit about how to get from idea to research proposal […]

  3. Matt Whyndham

    This is useful guidance for any discipline. The fuzzy front end needs a lot of processing, and experts forget how to articulate the techniques. I sometimes employ a funnel or filtration analogy, and recommend that it be implemented through a process involving brainstorming, then lists, each iteration having fewer items of greater depth, until there’s a choice of two or three. Thanks for illustrating how to work sideways within the funnel.

  4. Sigrid

    I love movie trailer remixes, and I have been wanting use them in a class sometime. Again you are ahead of the game! Great stuff! I agree tha your students are lucky!

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.