Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time he gives a talk on ChatGPT he meets audiences who are afraid.

I was surprised to hear that. Have I misinterpreted my audiences? They certainly pay more attention to talks about ChatGPT than they do about many other subjects. The ninth graders who visited UiB a couple of weeks ago were EXTREMELY attentive to the short talk I did for them about how LLMs work, and about AI bias and how My AI in Snapchat works. There wasn’t a single whisper or yawn. It actually never occurred to me that they might be scared rather than fascinated, absorbed, eager to learn.

What is your impression? Are people paying attention to AI because they are scared? Or is it amazement?

I’ll have to do an anonymous survey at my next talk, a Kahoot or Mentimeter or something – I tried asking the audience yesterday after Eirik’s point, but of course nobody put their hand up in answer to “Are you scared?”

The photos below are from the not just one, but two talks I did yesterday on ChatGPT: at a breakfast meeting for the Bergen Chamber of Commerce and at a lunch event for journalists and students at Media City Bergen, where I was on a panel with Eirik Solheim and Chris Ronald Hermansen, led by Lasse Lambrechts.

1 Comment

  1. Tin

    Am I frightened? That’s maybe overstating the case.
    Am I concerned, sometimes very deeply? Yes, definitely, and this explains just one of the reasons: https://reclaimthefacts.com/en/2023/04/07/exploring-the-risks-of-ai-in-spreading-misinformation-about-climate-change/

    But a huge concern is actually also that these AI companies are benefitting monetarily from unpaid work that hundreds of thousands of people have put into their websites, community projects, stories and all of the other things AI has scraped. Many of these websites, projects and stories are labours of love, often written and maintained by women, who are anyway already at the losing end of the wage gap.

    As far as I’m concerned, this is just another case of Silicon Valley tech bros getting rich on the unpaid work of others, including women and minorities.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  De Seta, Gabriele, and Anya Shchetvina. “Imagining Machine […]

Do people flock to talks about ChatGPT because they are scared?

Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time […]