In an effort to teach less next semester (since I’m administrating far, far more) I’ve outsourced 2/3 of the course I usually teach on digital media aesthetics to Rune Klevjer, videogame expert and Scott Rettberg, electronic literature guru. Then I’m picking up three weeks (so six lectures) in HUIN106, an undergraduate course on “Digital culture and norms”, which is co-taught by Hilde, who does a section on gender and technology and Magne, who does history of computing and open source. In total it means I might actually get away with really only spending 18.75 hours a week on teaching and administration, the way I’m supposed to. Hooray!

I’m looking forward to teaching into HUIN106. It was really rather nice figuring out what goes into the dossier, which had to get to the bookshop today for copyright clearance and copying. I’m going to do online communities, using the very pedagogical-looking overviews in Gunnar Liest¯l and Terje Rasmussen’s book. I figure we’ll look at MUDs and Usenet and chatrooms and all the rest of it. Then we’ll use Steven Johnson’s bit about the desktop metaphor to talk about how interfaces affect us, and we’ll look at Unix, Windows and Mac and compare that and then relate it back to the different interfaces for online communities. Bolter’s chapter on “Writing the Self”, along with Angela Thomas on how teenaged girls represent themselves online will take us into the self-expression side of things (I really must read Goffman, I promise I will this summer), which will lead on into blogs, and then on into ideas about democracy and power in online communities, and for that we’ll read the second chapter in Liest¯l and Rasmussen’s book, and my article on links and power, and Susan Herring et. al. on blogs.

Here are the articles and book chapters going into the dossier:

  • Liest¯l, Gunnar og Terje Rasmussen. Kapittel 8 og 9 (ìVirtuelle fellesskapî og ìDigitalt demokratiî) fra Digitale medier: en innf¯ring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2003. 97-125.
  • Johnson, Steven. ìThe Desktopî, fra Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate. New York: HarperEdge, 1997. 42-75.
  • Bolter, Jay David. Kapittel 9 og 10 (ìWriting the Selfî og ìWriting Cultureî) fra Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
  • Thomas, Angela. “Digital Literacies of the Cybergirl.” E-Learning 1.3 (2004): 358-82.
  • Walker, Jill. “Links and Power: The Political Economy of Linking on the Web.” Library Trends 53.4 (2005): 524-29.
  • Herring, Susan C., Inna Kouper, Lois Ann Scheidt og Elijah Wright. ìWomen and Children Last: The Discursive Construction of Weblogs.î Laura J. Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff, og Jessica Reyman (red.) Juni 2004. .

There’s no social software as such in there, or social network stuff. I might slip an online text in somewhere, I guess, and I’ll certainly show some of this in class.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]