Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni art autocorrect Blogging book ChatGPT conferences data analysis digital art electronic literature ELMCIP environmental art exhibition flies Gephi history journalister LLMs London machine vision market literature motherhood network analysis norsk open access Pierre Huyghe publication publications research science fiction self-representation selfies social media Surveillance talks teaching tracking trip report twitter UiB visualisation
Uncategorised

seminar on networks in oslo april 18

Jill12 Comments

I’m speaking at a seminar in Oslo on the 18th. It’s about digital and social networks, with speakers on Linux gift culture, about network economy, strong and weak ties, actors and actants in networks and about consumer networks. And me on networked storytelling. I get to stay in Oslo for a couple days, too, on this cool boat hotel, because I’m attending a meeting later that week about a series of digital stories NRK is going to be doing under the curatorship of Per Platou. Should be fun!

The program for the Oslo seminar follows. It’s open and free, as in beer.

NETTVERK!
SOSIALE – DIGITALE

?pent multifaglig seminar om nettverksbegrepet
18. april, kl. 10.00 – 17.00, rom 205, plan 2, Forskningsparken

Program

10.00: ?pning
TERJE RASMUSSEN, prosjektleder

10.15: Kodens sakramentale karisma — linuxsamfunnets gavekultur
LARS RISAN, postdoktor, TIK, UiO

11.15: Forbrukernettverk p nettet
WENCHE NAG, forsker, TELENOR R&D

12.15: Nettlitteratur: ? fortelle i nettverket
JILL WALKER, f¯rsteamanuensis, Seksjon. For humanistisk informatikk, UiB

LUNCH

14.00: Om Granovetters sterke og svake bÂnd
TERJE RASMUSSEN, professor, IMK, UIO

15.00:Nettverks¯konomi og transaksjonskostnader.
ARNE KROKAN, professor, Inst. for sosiologi, NTNU

16.00: Akt¯rer og aktanter i nettverk
DAGNY STUEDAHL postdoktor, IMK, UIO

Alle er velkomne!

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

12 thoughts on “seminar on networks in oslo april 18”

  1. jen

    I stayed on the innvik a few years ago after attending a graduate summer school at Oslo U, it is a great boat. Really yummy breakfast, too. Have a great time enjoying Oslo, it is one of my favourite cities.

  2. Jill

    Really? Excellent! Per told me he usually puts international people up there, and has heard nothign but good things about it. He even mentioned the breakfast as excellent. And having slept on a boat for the first time at ISEA last year I’m looking forward to being rocked to sleep, though maybe it’s rather different when the boat’s in harbour.

    Was the location creepy though? That’s the only thing worrying me, I don’t know the area, and wonder whether a harbour area will be unpleasant to walk to in the evening alone. I’ll get a taxi if it is, but it’s nice to be able to walk, and it looks pretty close to things from the map.

  3. hanna

    Is there a description of the conference in English somewhere?

  4. Jill

    Uh, not really, I don’t think, since it’ll all be in Norwegian. Sorry…

  5. hanna

    Bah! Oh well — just wanted to know more about the Linux stuff. 🙂

  6. Jill

    Here’s Lars Risan’s site. He’s the one speaking on Linux, which will be interesting. Actually this paper of his might be interesting: Hackers produce more than software, they produce hackers (Previously titled “The Identity Games of Hacker Culture”). Here’s the abstract:

    This paper discusses the social cohesion of Open Source projects. In Open Source programming most of the programmers who contribute to a project are very loyal to it, even if the Open Source licenses basically states that anybody can do what they want with the software, as long as they do not deny others the same right. The paper explores how loyalties to projects are created in social processes that also produce the identities of the programmers. In dialogue with Eric Raymondís seminal writing on Open Source, the paper partly draws on evolutionary psychology. Hence, two models are developed; symmetrical and complementary identity games.

    I’ve only skimmed it in the most perfunctorary manner, I must admit, but it’s certainly an interesting topic.

    I met Lars briefly when he was a PhD student, writing about the technology of cow breeding. I hadn’t realised he was writign about this now – interesting!

  7. jen

    The location of the innvik wasn’t creepy. It is a little isolated and devoid of people so I was alert when walking around there but I didn’t find it creepy. I loved it, but I’d just spent a week in a dorm room at a youth hostel so my own little cabin with my own little bathroom was heavenly. The reggae band that played the first night was also fun!

    Just looking at your site jill I am reawakening my dream of learning Norwegian and moving to Oslo! My partner and I loved it so much, it is the only place on earth we’ve found so far that we would leave Canada for. Any city whose subway line ends at a ski area rates full marks in my opinion!

  8. jen

    Oh, and the boat is close to everything, only a few minutes walk to the central train station and all the transit that is there.

  9. Jill

    Thanks Jen, that’s great to know about the location. And yes, Norway has a lot of good points 🙂

  10. jill/txt » first day of summer

    […] re when I’m thinking and writing than when I’m organising and administrating. Tomorrow I’m going to Oslo and I don’t know whether there’ll be much blogging at all. I wonder what […]

  11. jill/txt » notes: lars risan: “the sacramental charisma of the code”

    […] l charisma of the code”] [Post is in progress]Lars Risan is the first speaker at the network seminar I’m at in Oslo. Don’t you love the idea of code as sacrament? Lars is an anthropologis […]

  12. jill/txt » random notes from seminar

    […] jill/txt 19/4/2005 [random notes from seminar] One great thing about living on a boat hotel is that there’s no wireless and so you can actually finish answering all your email becau […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.