Got the student evaluations for last year’s class. I just skimmed them (too much else to do right now, I’ll look at it later) but I noticed a lovely question about how much work the students put into this course. Now the course is 15 credits, and full time students should take 30 credits each semester. So given a standard work week of 37,5 hours, students should expect to spend about 18 hours a week on my course. A few did.

10 Hvor mange timer i uken bruker du p?• emnet totalt, det vil si selvstudier, forelesning og annen undervisning? (How many hours a week do you spend on this course in total, including independent work as well as attending lectures and other classes?)

  no.students %
No answer 2 6
10 hours or less 11 33
11-16 hours 11 33
17-20 hours 4 12
21-25 hours 3 9
26 hours or more 2 6
Total 33 99

Actually this probably isn’t bad, and I just love those two students who spent more than 26 hours a week on the class.

The next question on the form asks whether they think the amount of work required is appropriate for the number of credits. TEN chose not to answer! Almost all the others said “about right”.

Next year I’m going to work them so much harder.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “how much do students work?”

  1. Johanka

    Your course is “worth” half of your students credit quota? I wish the university courses I took (in the Czech Republic) were that good…

  2. Dave Shearon

    Any correlation between time spent and grades? Any idea of intrinsic satisfaction compared to time spent? Do the surveys suggest why the great range in time spent, or does your experience with the students allow you to guess?

  3. James

    Interesting to see you also have feedback questionnaires. My modules are ¬º of a semester so maybe students should expect to spend 9 hours per week … my University suggests something like 13 hours (maybe we have a longer working week <grin>) Sadly few get near that!

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]