Oh no. Three people have tagged me to do the “Five things you didn’t know about me” meme. Ndesanjo Macha, who’s fifth thing we didn’t know about him is that he is a disiple of Houdini and can disappear in front of your eyes (can these five things be fictional do you think?), and Torill Mortensen, who has hand-painted a whole set of china (I would never have guessed), and Karin, who danced ballet. Oh no. I even thought of doing it but what would I write that I haven’t already told the world that I’d actually be OK with the world knowing? I mean, I can’t disappear while you watch (well, not literally) and I never ran for president, either.

What would you want to know, anyway?

I wish I’d run for president of the United States. I suppose you’ve got to be a citizen, really, though Ethan ran despite being under 35 and therefore ineligible. Look, here’s the form you fill out, courtesy of 4ied.net’s post on How to Run For President of the United States. Doesn’t look too hard, really. Though from filing the form to getting on the ballots and getting the votes, well, a bit too complicated and expensive for most of us, I reckon.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 thoughts on “five things – oh no

  1. Karin

    Funny you should mention the president thing, thought of that myself for this “5 secrets”. When I was a kid I actually considered becoming the American president as a goal, despite being Swedish and all. Came to my senses, in all respects, regarding that one too…

    And by the way, I absolutely understand if you won’t follow up on this, you probably have far better things to do! Happy New Year

  2. torill

    Muhaha! (that’s the trademarket evil laugh, right?

    Curious as I am, I have spent time to think about why this particular meme is so annoying, and at the same time so persistent. I think the interesting part of this meme is the challenge between what people don’t know about you, and what part of that knowledge you are able to share. We do, after all, have a huge stack of things people don’t know – and we are very grateful they don’t. But when you have to sit down and figure out what things about you is so out of synch with your personality that you don’t share it in random conversations, and still is within the range of socially acceptable, well, it’s a challenge! At least when you’re as old and set in the behaviour people recognize as I am. Probably why many have to go back to the childhood, a time of innocence and experimentation in order to find those publishable secrets.

  3. Liz Lawley

    Yes, well. I tagged you too, but apparently you missed that. 🙂

    As to why this one has been so infectious, I think some of it is timing. It came out at a time of year when many of us don’t really want to write about daily life, because it’s too personal or stressful or frustrating. And at a time when people are feeling like they ought to be writing _something_ to open or close the year.

    But yes, I think Torill’s right–the tension and challenge of striking a balance in the “five things” is seductive. It’s also interesting to me how people seemed to pick up cues from those who’d tagged them. So there was a whole “picky eater/food preferences” branch that I was a part of.

  4. Luca

    I’m really amused by this meme. It force you to make something that you ‘d rather prefer not to do. So why it works? I had a post-it on my computer for a whole day with “5 things you don’t know” written on it… and I something has been added or deleted more than a couple of time. Muhaha! (C)

  5. Jill

    Hey, Liz, you didn’t tag me! Not that I mightn’t have ignored it and then forgotten it – I was planning to do that with Torill’s tag until I received emails from two other taggers in the same day…

    Interesting thoughts from all of you about the peculiarities of the meme – not that that’ll maek it any easier to do it!!

  6. Liz Lawley

    Ha! You’re right. I remember now. I had you on the list, then I remember that you almost never do these things, so I took you off and replaced you with Adam. 🙂

  7. Jill

    Aha, there ya go!

  8. fivecats

    I even thought of doing it but what would I write that I havenít already told the world that Iíd actually be OK with the world knowing?

    Why, the five things you were most afraid you’d be asked, of course!

  9. Jill

    Aha! And I wouldn’t even have to ANSWER those things. Hm.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.