Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni art autocorrect Blogging book ChatGPT conferences data analysis digital art electronic literature ELMCIP environmental art exhibition flies Gephi history journalister LLMs London machine vision market literature motherhood network analysis norsk open access Pierre Huyghe publication publications research science fiction self-representation selfies social media Surveillance talks teaching tracking trip report twitter UiB visualisation
Uncategorised

comedian dressed as bin laden gets through $250 million security at APEC summit in Sydney

Jill3 Comments

I’ve been in Australia a week without blogging. It took a few days to get set up with internet access and library access and a parking permit and so on here at UWA, but I’m now happily ensconced in the Scholars’ Centre in the Reid Library, with everything I need. I’m editing the many words written for my book on blogging, mostly, and somehow the blogging urge hasn’t appeared. Until now.

Chaser's fake security badgeSee, one of the things I love about Australia is the sense of humour. Since I arrived, the news has been filled with little but the APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) meetings in Sydney, and the extreme security around it all. Apparently Sydney is a pretty unpleasant place for non-world-leaders right now, full of security fences and checkpoints and with freeways and bridges inaccessible because Bush or Putin is using them. But yesterday a bunch of comedians from the ABC show The Chaser’s War on Everything managed to inadvertently breach two checkpoints. Look at their security badges – not too convincing, eh? They drove a motorcade, complete with “security guards” running along side it and Australian and Canadian flags adorning it, and were waved through two checkpoints, ending up deep in the restricted zone. When they were practically at Bush’s hotel, and by their own reckoning approaching the restricted zone, they turned the car around, and one of them jumped out, dressed as Bin Laden, and said something like “I’m an important world leader why don’t I have a seat at the APEC table?” That was Sydney police’s first hint that something might be amiss.

All eleven of the Chaser team was arrested under the special temporary laws for APEC that allow police to stop and search civilians in Sydney without a warrant, and detain them without charges for 48 hours. They’ve been released on bail. And while the authorities are talking about how inappropriate it was to pull a prank like this during a serious security event, an overwhelming majority of the people on the talk show I listened to driving to uni this morning reckoned the joke was on the police and fully supported the Chaser. Plus, well, you know, it’s funny!

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “comedian dressed as bin laden gets through $250 million security at APEC summit in Sydney”

  1. JoseAngel

    Yeah, only thing is one of this days one of the pranksters might get shot… if only to show that security doesn’t suck!

  2. FeelingFlirty

    This is the same APEC where George W. Bush thanked the Austrians for welcoming him to OPEC ?

  3. Norman Hanscombe

    The puzzling thing is that apparently none of the police recognised the comedians. Even on the television screen, they were instantly recognisable. Doesn’t even ONE of the police watch the A.B.C. channel? No wonder this group is currently negotiating to switch to a commercial channel, where hopefully more viewers will watch them.

    The Anti-APEC Demo in Sydney was something of a squib, and easily the most poorly attended one I’ve ever been to, so the Chasers escapade was definitely the media highlight of a dull week.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.