Once this book manuscript is done (deadline October 10, and it looks like I’m on track) I’m going to explore all manner of online narratives, and Kate Modern will have to be one of them. This is a spin-off from the Lonelygirl15 series of videos that was a hit on YouTube last year, but set in London, and sponsored by and integrated with the British social networking site Bebo. Here’s Kate’s Bebo profile, and an edited “catch up” sequence for those of us who haven’t been following the story since July.

Watch More Videos       Uploaded by bebo.com/MyKateModern
Apparently there’s a new show planned in the same style for later this autumn, also to run on Bebo: Sophia’s Diary. Given that Bebo’s a social networking site for real friends to connect on, I wonder whether they’ll get upset users reacting to this introduction of a fictional character on the site, as Friendster users objected to the Friendster-sanctioned fakesters from TV-series? This question from a user suggests Bebo’s pushing Kate Modern without necessarily explaining that she’s fictional.

And though I haven’t really explored Kate Modern too much yet, it does look as though the several-years-old Online Caroline (which I wrote about back in 2002) is still more advanced narratively and technically than the new web video serials.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. zeroinfluencer

    Hi Jill

    you might be interested in this project we have just completed.

    http://www.wherearethejoneses.com

    It’s a comedy written by the audience across a wiki, with the filming happening around Europe.

    Here’s some information about the thinking behind the project.

    http://zeroinfluence.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/talking-about-the-joneses/

    Best,
    David

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]