So the latest fuss in the Norwegian social mediasphere is about Even Sandvold Roland, an 18-year-old in his final year of high school who wrote a tweet yesterday evening complaining that he couldn’t buy a song legally in Norway that was available in the US. A representative for Norwegian Warner Brothers tweeted back somewhat too hastily: “I think you should steal it, then, and brag about it afterwards in your brat* blog. I don’t want you to be angry.” (He deleted the tweet this afternoon, but Jon Hoem (and many others) have screenshots.) Even Sandvold Roland wrote an excellent blog post about this, piles of Twitter users joined in the fray, someone wrote a post about it in English which landed on Digg, the Warner Brothers executive wrote an apology (published on Even Sandvold Roland’s blog), it was in the mainstream media by morning and by noon today, Even was being interviewed on the stage of the Norwegian Editor’s Association‘s annual meeting. An aside: the program for their meeting is only available as a word file – how old media. Yet obviously they also have people who get new media and were able to twitter their way into getting the key player in this latest affair on stage so quickly – and look, the interview with Even Sandvold Roland and the debate following it is already online:

This is a fabulous example of how different the public sphere is today – and how out of control it can get. PR people often talk about how social media give them direct access to their audiences, allowing them to bypass the journalists who have their own agendas and of course the journalistic desire to emphasise conflicts and problems. This is an example of the opposite: if the record company exec had been talking to a journalist rather than firing off 140 characters from his sofa he would almost certainly not have called a would-be customer a brat. He would have moderated his tone and choice of words according to his awareness that he would be quoted.

I don’t really know that the record company exec was sitting in his sofa when he wrote those words, but I sort of assume so. It was 7:30 in the evening, after all, and the tone he uses is very informal. He shows no awareness of speaking in the public sphere – he’s writing directly to Even Sandvold Roland but the irony, one assumes, must be largely for the benefit of his friends.

He quickly saw his mistake. His next tweets attempt to modify what he said, and within three hours he’s written a lengthy apology for using such derogatory language, with explanations for why the music isn’t available in Norway – rights are complicated and Warner Brothers isn’t trying to aggravate people, he says.

And yet the damage is done. His apology is unlikely to receive as many Diggs as the intitial blunder. Perhaps we’ll simply all have to get used to a world where our mistakes are public. More and more young people simply say they don’t care that their future employers will see photos of them at parties or making fools of themselves. Everyone will have such embarrassments in the future; not having them would make you more suspect. Even in old media this may be the way to go. While previous US presidents pretended they hadn’t smoked marihuana (or claimed not to have inhaled), Obama published an autobiography admitting to his experimentation with drugs. And so nobody bother’s to kick up a fuss about it.

I’m not sure that will make the record company exec feel any better though.

* The original is drittunge, which is untranslatable, literally meaning “shit-kid” but in practice a word most often used scathingly by kids or teenagers to refer to annoying, grubby, younger kids.

Update: I like how Dagbladet has inserted a live Twitter feed of Norwegian tweets mentioning the word “Warner” in their article about the topic. Cool.

Update 2: I’m reading The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet and I’m feeling pretty bad for the record company guy – the internet can be so harsh. Not that it’ll make much difference, but I took his name out of the post. It’s available plenty of other places but at least I’m not adding to it quite so badly.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

20 thoughts on “calling a customer a brat: twitter and the distinctions between public and private

  1. Svein Larsen

    RT @jilltxt Blogged about the #drittunge fuss in the Norwegian twittosphere: http://jilltxt.net/?p=2379

  2. SonsofNorway

    Great article on customer service and new vs. old media culture clash. http://jilltxt.net/?p=2379

  3. SonsofNorway

    RT @jilltxt Blogged about the #drittunge fuss in the Norwegian twittosphere: http://jilltxt.net/?p=2379

  4. iacob

    Here’s the program.

  5. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Ah, thank you! I love that the video of the debate is already out, too!

  6. Jill Walker Rettberg

    For future reference: Jon Hoem has a thorough description of the events (in Norwegian) complete with screenshots of everything, which I may be borrowing if I use this example in a talk sometime…

  7. Svein Larsen

    Thanks for the link from Twitter.
    This is really interesting news.

    Looks like TP’s account on Twitter is deleted now :/

    Ha en god dag,
    SL.

  8. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Huh. He hasn’t deleted his account, just that particular tweet. Which I can kind of understand – although it’s so utterly too late now that screenshots of the tweet are in every media outlet and half the blogs in the country…

  9. Svein Larsen

    Ah yes, sorry, you’re right.
    Sorry for the mistake, I’m a new Twitter.

    SL.

  10. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Oh, I didn’t mean to be dismissive of YOU, Svein! My “Huh.” was in response to the deletion – following the link it certainly looked as though the whole account was gone until I went and looked. I found Twitter somewhat mystifying at first, I’ll admit 🙂

  11. Henrik Moltke

    Must-read on twitter, modern PR and fatal arrogance of recording industry: http://ping.fm/lzr57 and http://ping.fm/DGjkv (.no)

  12. andreaBL

    reading “twitter and the distinctions between public and private” http://is.gd/u4HC

  13. mike castleman

    Norwegian record industry calls its customer a ‘brat’ on twitter. http://jilltxt.net/?p=2379 (via @moltke)

  14. […] calling a customer a brat: twitter and the distinctions between public and private [jill/txt] – A cautionary tale: in Norway a teenager wrote on Twitter, complaining he couldn’t legally purchase a song in Norway which was available in the US. A Warner Brothers’ representative in Norway saw the tweet, and twittered back a response which basically called the teenager a brat and suggested (sarcastically) that he should just pirate it. The exchange was widely linked to, Warner Brothers had to issue a public apology. Jill notes this is a clear case of folks on Twitter not clearly understanding that it’s public space: “… if the record company exec had been talking to a journalist rather than firing off 140 characters from his sofa he would almost certainly not have called a would-be customer a brat. He would have moderated his tone and choice of words according to his awareness that he would be quoted.” […]

  15. Even

    Excellent article – well written and to the point. I must admit that I wasnít aware of your blog before I stumbled upon your article about me, but I sure am aware of it now 🙂 Just a small correction, my name is Even Sandvold, not Sandvoll.

  16. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Thanks, Even, and sorry about the misspelling of your name – I’ve fixed it now. And ditto about your blog!

  17. Stessa Cohen

    distinct betw public & private conversation @jilltxt blogs about Nor. exec who calls customer brat on twitter – http://jilltxt.net/?p=2379

  18. […] About the Norwegian “drittunge” scandal […]

  19. […] Thomas Moen har satt sammen en flott presentasjon med flere gode eksempler fra sosiale medier i Norge det siste ?•ret eller s?•. Kikk s?¶rlig p?• “drittunge”-saken, som begynner p?• slide nr 82 – her ser du hvordan en slengbemerkning fra en ansatt hos Warner gikk fra Twitter via blogger til ?• bli en av dagens st??rste nyhetssaker neste morgen. Om du foretrekker ?• lese i fulle setninger i stedet for ?• se skjermbilder av tweets osv, har jeg et sammendrag her, og det fins mange andre ogs?•. […]

  20. […] April 2009: Drittungesaken – en Warneransatt kaller en musikkfan en drittunge Âpent p Twitter. Det blir brÂk. […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.