Maybe I’m starting to get the point of Quora. I’ve been a member there for ages, of course, but I just followed a few topics and people and forgot about it. It looks as though most of my friends who I follow on Quora have done the same thing – and since I’ve not been using it in any focused way, most of the questions I see are silly, like “What will be the top tech trends in 2012?” and What’s it like to be a God?” Oh, I suppose they’re interesting questions in a way but I have so many other ways to waste my time on the internet, you know?

But to finish updating the “history of blogging” I wanted some kind of estimate of how many blogs there are, which is of course an impossible question – but typing that into google led me to several Quora questions. I had a more specific question about surveys that show bloggers as a proportion of the whole population rather than trying to count the number of blogs, so I started entering it, and realized that there’s this whole system of credits on Quora where I can spend credits to ask specific people to answer my question. So that’s how people get celebrities to answer! I wonder if Quora could get me better answers to this question than Facebook or Twitter or this blog?

Maybe you know the answer to my question? To humour this newcomer to Quora, maybe  you would answer it on Quora?

I asked Cameron Marlow and Dave Sifry to answer, mostly because they founded early blog indexes (Blogdex and Technorati) and so I’d been thinking about them as I’ve worked on the blogging history part of my book. I would have asked Amanda Lenhart, since she wrote the Pew survey from 2006, but she’s not on Quora it seems. And of course I asked Liz Lawley since she would likely know. I didn’t even have to spend any credits to ask her, because she’s my friend.

Do you use Quora? Do you find it useful?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Which surveys answer how large a proportion of the whole population blogs?

  1. Linn

    I don’t use Quora often – I save it for the really important questions and I’m so pleased with the answers I receive! They’re quality answers.
    I’ve asked mostly software/app questions like:

    A smart way to keep track of my billable hours

    I guess i could have just googled the question. In fact I did, and I didn’t trust the page ranks – I trust the people of Quora more – and I’m so happy with the program that was suggested to me!

  2. Jill

    Linn, I’ve looked at how you’ve used Quora now and I see how it’s really useful for some things. I’ve been exploring it a bit more – interesting how some services you really have to use to understand.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.