Amazing how suddenly one can just not blog for a whole week, after blogging many times a day for a while. Most of the reason I didn’t blog was that we just spent three and a half days up at Hilde and Atle’s place in Sogn, where Hilde and I drafted the introduction for our anthology on World of Warcraft, and Scott finished his chapter and read our introduction for us. I really don’t spend enough time just exploring this beautiful country. I mean, I’ve lived here most of my life and still I hadn’t really grasped not only how close Sognefjorden is but how stunningly beautiful it is. Oh, of course I’ve seen it before, but after this trip I really want to spend more time there. So Scott and I extended our initial plan to take visiting family on Norway on a Nutshell before our wedding and have started thinking about a three day trip the week after the wedding, for those family members who are still around. It should be wonderful.

I was planning to blog the table of contents for the WoW anthology, but I’m going to wait until the final final drafts are in in a few days time so we have the final chapter titles.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “sognefjorden

  1. Albertine

    I can¥t do anything else but to live here. Tell me next time you¥re around! I live in the centre of Sogndal, close to the fjord. I¥ll invite you for a cup of coffee, and you can try my kayak, if you like! 🙂

  2. Jill

    You have a kayak!? Ooh, what fun. I’ll take you up on that 🙂

  3. Nick

    Hi Jill,

    just wanted to say that your essay in Second Person was really inspiring. I was writing a presentation for a conference of market researchers, ad agency people and marketing people and your chapter really brought to life how important quests are to the WoW experience. It’s so easy to take them for granted whilst playing that I forgot how well they immerse you in the lore and mythology of the world.

    Anyway your chapter gave me an idea that I knew would appeal to my audience – the idea of quests as adverts! It went down very well, so thanks 🙂

    Here are a couple of links reviewing my presentation – http://www.leemcewan.com/serendipitybook/2007/03/one_of_the_most.html
    http://www.warc.com/ConferenceBlogs/MRSR-032007.asp?Post=47

  4. Jill

    Wow, that’s an turn on it that I wouldn’t have expected, cool! Sounds like the presentation went really well – wish I’d seen it! And I’m really pleased that my paper was inspiring! Do you know whether there is any marketing in WoW, apart from spam to sell gold and levelling services? I imagine you were comparing to Second Life where obviously marketing is built in?

  5. Nick

    Ha ha, glad you liked my twist on your idea! My presentation is quite a heavy document because it has lots of fraps footage in there, but I could put it on a hosting site for you to download. I put together my first bit of machinima telling the Stonefield-McClure saga which I’d love you to see.

    I don’t think there is any marketing in WoW at the moment, the closest I’ve seen is the Coke/WoW ad in China http://youtube.com/watch?v=UokDWzJY1xM.

    I think it’s dawning on lots of companies that 2nd Life hasn’t got as great a potential for profit as once thought, and is used as a PR stunt as much as anything. That means WoW is starting to register on their radars as a possible marketing medium. I think it could happen, if it’s done the right way. Some of my guildmates were joking about resting at an inn called McDougals and farming the Barrens for burger meat. I guess it all depends on what the companies have to offer Blizzard!

  6. Nick

    P.S. looking forward to reading the WoW project you and Hilde are working on.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.