Also, I downgraded from Word 2004 to Word X so that I could use the Cite-While-You-Write feature of Endnote, which is lovely because you can easily add references and reformat the bibliography at your leisure. Endnote has yet to release an upgrade that lets it talk to Word 2004. Unfortunately I’d forgotten that the Word/Endnote combination also seems to radically slow down my computer, giving me spinning wheels of misfortune that offer the perfect opportunity to pop over to another more responsive window and just, well, just get totally distracted. As I am now. Back to Word.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “wheel of misfortune

  1. Mitsu

    (Now, isn’t calling it a “URI” a little confusing? More accurate, but the reality is, everybody calls it an URL, so we might as well just accept the slightly less accurate term for the sake of communication…)

    These Mac tools make me want to switch to a Mac. I would if they had a low-power G5 laptop. I mean, Alamut has stopped writing all because of his beloved DevonThink. Available only for the Mac.

    I suspect your spinning wheels of death would be alleviated by more RAM. Maybe a lot more RAM. But then again maybe not.

  2. Patrik Svensson

    Jill, don’t you think that endnote type applications represent an unattainable dream – being organized, having the computer do the work (ultimately manifested in a write-a-dissertation macro) and saving time. I love these programs have tried a whole bunch. My current favorite tool is Biblioscape – which to seems to be much more “modern” than most others (including Endnote which is pretty much a card box:). For instance it allows for web publishing and editing/adding through a web page (as well as the program itself).

  3. snwbrdr-xyz

    “…Cite-While-You-Write feature of Endnote, which is lovely because you can easily add references and reformat the bibliography at your leisure.”

    Have you considered using LaTeX (in conjunction with Bibtex), rather than Word ? Takes a while to get used to it, but afterwards you never want to go back.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]