Ew. In September Critical Art Ensemble are coming from New York to Stavanger’s iolab to lead a workshop in wetware. Wetware, yes, that means making art from organic materials. I’m a wimp, but there’s something about the word wetware that makes me imagine my hands deep inside a freshly killed deer, pulling out its still almost beating heart. Actually, I think they’re more the white labcoats kind of artists than the hunter in Snow White. One of them, Steve Kurtz, very uncomfortably had FBI agents remove the e.coli. bacteria from his house after his wife died and the police thought the biomaterials looked suspicious. (The e.coli. bit is from memory since the newspaper linked from there has removed the story.) I’m no wetware art expert, so couldn’t tell you whether genetic art like Eduardo Kac’s fluorescent green bunny rabbit (neither art nor new, say some) fall within the wetware paradigm. My aesthetic reactions are primal: it’s frightening, horrible, like that hot bloody heart pulled from the deer’s docile body and my analytical abilities are bypassed completely. Some might say that’s a sign of the artists’ success.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “wetware

  1. lisa

    We have an artist-in-residence/teacher here who likes to make his art out of found things. One of the more startling and visceral was a sculpture made from the mechanical innards of a clock and liberally encrusted with Japanese beetle corpses.

  2. scott

    That’s creepy. The whole deer thing. Creepy.

    I heard Eduardo Kac talk a few months back. Although the projects he does are interesting and “new” in a sense that most art is not, I sort of had (and have) the feeling that most biotech art is a sort of extended joke about the nature of art. Concept art about the word made flesh.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]