Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni art autocorrect Blogging book ChatGPT conferences data analysis digital art electronic literature ELMCIP environmental art exhibition flies Gephi history journalister LLMs London machine vision market literature motherhood network analysis norsk open access Pierre Huyghe publication publications research science fiction self-representation selfies social media Surveillance talks teaching tracking trip report twitter UiB visualisation
Uncategorised

they banned VEGEMITE???

Jill2 Comments

Vegemite ad 1930sI was shocked to wake up this morning to news that Vegemite has been banned by the United States! Apparently, they can’t accept the folate in the good stuff, because folate is only permitted in cereals and breads. Actually, that sounds like a load of hogwash, since the folate in Vegemite is natural and the US regulations are only about added folates (or at least, so says Cerebral Soup in their “is it a hoax?” article), but hoax or not, the story is perfectly suited to boost Australian identity.

We’re going to the US for Thanksgiving. Now I assume I’ll be pulled aside and strip-searched for illicit Vegemite once they see my Aussie passport, like the Aussie expats living in Canada who were trying to smuggle a jar of the good stuff across the US border. Heck, even that bizarre Aussie gift shop across from the hotel I stayed at once in San Antonio (yes, in Texas) says they haven’t been able to get Vegemite.

Aussie loot from simplyaustralian.comBut ya know what? My trusty US source of Vegemite, simplyaustralian.com, says that though they’re out of stock of all but the tiny jars, they should have more in later this week. Hm. Is the vegemite crisis just spin? A viral marketing campaign by Vegemite’s advertising agency? Or maybe a subtle way of getting all us expats to feel all protective of our Australian culture? I mean, half of you probably didn’t even know that I was Australian. Not as if you can hear my accent on the blog, and after all, I live all the way over on the other side of the world… Look at Technorati’s list of the many recent blog posts about vegemite – if it’s viral marketing, it’s working. (First seen on BoingBoing)

Update: SimplyAustralian emailed me back with the following answer to my question about whether Vegemite was banned:

We are expecting our shipment into Seattle on Wednesday or Thursday and will need FDA clearance in order to sell it. At this point we are not expecting any problems. Check back on Friday for an update……….jan

So wait and see…

Update 2: “US denies Vegemite ban”

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “they banned VEGEMITE???”

  1. Ali

    Is Marmite still allowed?!? Not quite the same, but I personally prefer it to Vegemite (this could have much to do with me being British).

    I’m going to be in the US for a month later this year, and wont survive without Marmite!

  2. Jill

    I think you should definitely risk it and bring Marmite. But in checked luggage so you avoid the strip search. I guess Marmite’d count as a liquid or paste and be banned as handluggage anyway.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.