Tomorrow’s class will be about citation techniques. Again. Instead of me doing the standard old-fashioned teaching routine (explain it for 45 minutes using voice and overheads, post examples for them to read and then assume the knowledge was successfully transmitted from brain to brain – big surprise: it wasn’t), tomorrow the students will be doing the work. Small groups, specific problems to solve, suggestions of possible places to look for the necessary information.

One problem will obviously be to figure out how to cite a game, based on Chicago style but perhaps with input from DiGRA’s game reference project and from MobyGames database of infrormation about games, dates, producers, and with a consideration of who or what to put where you’d put the author of a book or the director of a movie. I think the whole class can deal with that problem, each group tackling a different section of it.

We defintely need to practice citing websites too. Sometimes poor citation technique does a student such a disservice: I was really skeptical about the source listed in one student’s bibliography as “Art: history” (http://www.calarts.edu/~line/history.html), which the student proposed using as a basic for understanding the history of net.art. The site is a list of sites with no further information – unless you go up a few levels (just take the last bit of the URL off) and see that it’s actually part of a course web site at Calarts, made by Nathalie Bookchin, who’s one of the absolutely leading net.art theoreticians and practitioners. Figuring out a way of citing that website that actually shows its legitimacy despite its not being published by Routledge or MIT Press or something is an obvious problem students need to solve. I’ll tell you what the students suggest tomorrow.

A final task I’ll be setting will include new ways of searching: Go to amazon.com, search for a word, concept, name or title that’s important in the project you’re researching, find a book that discusses it that you weren’t aware of, assess whether the reference is interesting to you and write a proper citation of that book, with page numbers.

Then discuss whether that’s good enough academically: citing a book when you’ve never actually touched it, only seen an image of a few pages of it at amazon.

I’m also going to have to work out how to help students remember when to use italics, when quotation marks, how to put a citation in the text. I had completely forgotten how mysterious all these things are when they’re new to you.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “teaching citations

  1. Mark Bernstein

    Figuring out a way of citing that website that actually shows its legitimacy despite its not being published by Routledge or MIT Press or something is an obvious problem students need to solve.

    I don’t thin it’s the job of the citation to credential the source. We do this in the main text.

    A. B. Clump, a leading proponent of the Widget Theory, observed [Clump 79}…

    Though Widget Theory has attracted a range of followers — the enthusiastic but erratic Clump [Clump 79], the duller but more reliable Smodget (see [Blair 92[), and the brilliant though little-known Whelk [Dewey & Rose 98, ch. 3]

    Only the most inexperienced students will make the mistake of citing a source whose citation patently discredits itself. You learn in your cradle that you never cite the Encyclopedia Brittanica or Cliff’s Notes, right?

    This is interesting because the craft of placing citations in context is also the craft of weaving links smoothly and meaningfully into exposition….

  2. Deena

    The other difficulty is the transient nature: You need to cite the date accessed. This becomes odd as you revisit the citation as you re-edit the piece
    (URL name, author accessed DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE..) this is not a comfortable solution for governnment citations as people need to go back. What we have ended up doing is caching the site from internet explorer, putting it on a disk, and shoving it into the administrative record. Thank Someone that no one has yet suggested printing the thing out yet.

  3. Norman

    Thanks for providing me one more advantage of being old — I don’t have to cope with this.

  4. Timbu :: Musings

    Citing
    “jill/txt incites web site cite sightings” I have always had questions about how to properly cite web stes. Unfortunately, I still do.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.