My students finished their first project last week: it’s a collaborative, subjective guide to the university, where each student has made a single page with a photo of and text related to something they love or hate or see every day. In addition each student had to make an entrance page to this material, either individually or in a group. Here’s what they’re supposed to have learnt doing this:

  • basic HTML, uploading a file to a server, validating your code
  • how to take a photo, transfer it to the computer, save it for web, upload it, embed it in an HTML document
  • how to write a text for the web that’s enjoyable to read
  • ways of thinking about organising content

While lots of the individual pages are excellent and I love how creative they’ve been, I’m particularly happy about the many different kinds of start pages the students made. Pedagogically I think this is great – it made it easy to talk today about how these different approaches work in different ways, and hopefully it opens up possibilities for the students rather than prescribes. Here’s one of my favourite start pages: Utend¯rs innend¯rs bygninger. It sets a very different tone to this (or this or this) geographic organisation, doesn’t it? Here’s one where a Douglas Adams sentence is used as a rather cryptic organisational principle, and one where neat categories are annotated and clearly presented. Or perhaps you’d prefer a list? Here’s a collection of screen shots of 15 of the pages, and here’s a list organised by author name, category and title. Or, depending on your goals here, you might find a division by gender of the author interesting: men and women authors.

The project is not a polished, finished work. The students were instructed that if the entrance pages they envisioned were too ambitious technically that was fine, they could just describe what they couldn’t yet do. The site doesn’t even have an index.html page yet. It’s a bunch of trying, failing and succeeding and there would be plenty to do to complete it. I had a lot of fun poking around in there, though, and so might you if you’re familiar with the University of Bergen. Soon I’ll make a proper front page for it. Soon. Here’s the entrance page.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. A lecturer's tale...

    Beginning HTML pedagogically
    Jill presents a lovely example of creative students using a creative medium and being inspired by their lecturer…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]