Stuart Moulthrop arrived in Bergen last night. Stuart has been in hypertext since before most of us knew what hypertext was, and he writes inspiring essays about hypertext theory and digital culture and makes wonderful creative works. One of my favourites is Reagan Library, which is a few years old now but still wonderful. It’s a story of confused memories, and each node of the story is initially full of noise: the words are literally unstable, many of them random. But each time you return to a node, it becomes more stable, and finally, after four readings of each node, the node is fairly comprehensible. Oh, and he gives awesome talks. My favourite was the one he did in our MOO in 1999 – it’s archived here but of course that gives you none of the feel of what it was like, forty or fifty people crowded into a virtual room, yabbering away with asides to Stuart’s capital letter official presentation, and with slides shown in an adjacent window. He also gave a keynote at the first academic conference I was ever at, Hypertext ’98, and I remember loving the slides, the verve and the intensity of it all.

Stuart’s going to be a guest researcher at humanistic informatics for a week and a half – and in addition to giving us a chance to hang out and talk research with him, this’ll mean he’s giving a couple of talks, which you’re very welcome to attend if you’re in town.

flyer about Stuart Moulthrop's talks

So, if you’re in Bergen, come to Stuart’s lecture on the 22nd or his demonstration on the 23rd. I’ll be there, of course 🙂


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]