In Norway the air raid sirens are tested at exactly 12 noon every year or so. They haven’t been needed since WW2, but the tests ensure that new generations are reminded that peace is not a given. Now the authorities are considering using SMS messages to warn the population of invasion or attacks using chemical, nuclear or biological weapons. The image has stuck with me since I read about it in Aftenposten yesterday: just imagine everyone’s mobile phones beeping at once, everyone reaching into their pockets, everyone reading the same message at the same time. And then what? Panic? A calm orderly procession towards the old airraid shelters dug in cellars and mountains, long since turned into rock clubs?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “SMS replacing sirens?”

  1. mcb

    It somehow lacks the drama and scale of ab air raid siren. It’s amazing how chilling that sound is, even to a generation who have not experienced war first hand.

  2. Anders Jacobsen

    Something tells me that in a crisis situation like the ones cited, one would rather reserve the telecommunications infrastructure for more urgent matters….? The US has launched a list of some 50 000 “super users” whose phones will have priority access to the cell phone network(s) in times of crisis – now THAT would be an idea for Norway (seeing the endless debate on implementing secure, closed TETRA(?) networks…)

  3. Eiriks forfatterblogg

    SMS-tyfoner
    Jill skriver om et genialt forslag fra Sivilforsvaret. PÂ nettsiden 11. september 2002 – hva er gjort? stÂr det blant

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]