George Bush’s official campaign website is currently off limits to anyone outside of the US and Canada. Go on, try clicking the link: georgewbush.com – it’s “403 forbidden”. Isn’t that weird? John Kerry‘s site’s still talking to us.

It might be a response to a DoS attack that might be the cause of six hours of downtime on October 19. If the attack (if there was an attack – the Republicans won’t comment the blocking) was from outside of the US, it would make sense, I suppose, for their server to simply refuse to communicate with any computer outside of the US. Though surely avid hackers could get round that anyway by just attacking through a US computer?

It’s an apt metaphor for the way Bush generally handles world opinion though. Say no to the Kyoto global warming treating, though the US is responsible for 36.1% of the world’s greenhouse transmissions. Invade Iraq, though the UN says no. Refuse to sign an global treaty allowing war criminals from any nation to be tried in an international court. See no world, hear no world, speak not with the world. (via Grandtextauto)

[Update: Boing Boing has lots of reader info though no official story on this, and one of Joi Ito’s readers has this example of a polite way of banning the world.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “see no world, hear no world”

  1. Blog Vrij van Nut » Kiekeboe

    […] ut

    27 oktober 2004

    Kiekeboe

    Collegablogger Jill meldt vanuit Noorwegen dat de website van George Bush onbereikbaar is van buiten de VS en Canada […]

  2. jill/txt » reality television

    […] . Of course I’ll go. I’ll bring beer, talk politics and bemoan the situation. Our futures depend on this too. Lost innocence, we can no longer pretend otherwise. In Denmark anti-A […]

  3. Jorunn

    Well, if you go by way of, say, http://rinkworks.com/dialect/ you still get to the official Bush site, presented in the dialect of your choice 🙂

  4. H?•kon Styri

    If georgewbush.com doesn’t make sense (or doesn’t work), you could try http://www.georgewbush.org/ 😉

    (The parody site is probably less scary than the real site translated to redneck. However, there are many free proxy servers that may give you access to georgewbush.com without adding some weird translation.)

  5. fivecats

    On another note, would you be willing to give a translation to a new Norwegian site for those of us who are Norwegian-impaired?

    http://killhim.nu/

    tak!

  6. fivecats

    The BBC is reporting this story now as well at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3958665.stm

    …

  7. Jill

    Oh dear. Killhim.nu claims to be collecting donations towards a bounty for whoever assassins Bush. They claim to be against violence but believe he’s doing too much evil. I assume it’s ironic, there’s no way of actually donating since there’s no links or further info.

    It’s a really stupid way of making a point, and a awful idea.

    The BBC article’s interesting, it suggests they’re simply saving bandwidth with increasing traffic:

    Mike Prettejohn, president of Netcraft, speculated that the blocking decision might have been taken to cut costs, and traffic, in the run-up to the election on 2 November.

    He said the site may see no reason to distribute content to people who will not be voting next week.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]