Have you seen Eric Faden’s A Fair(y) Use Tale? It uses clips from a couple of dozen Disney movies to explain copyright and fair use:

I found the video in a very useful teaching resource for discussing copyright in relation to remixes at TeachingCopyright.org. One of their suggested lesson plans for high school students is specifically about remixes and when a remix can be said to be covered by fair use. Students learn a bit about fair use, view two-three videos (A Fair(y) Use Tale is one of them) and then use a Trial Guide to research and finally run a mock trial where Disney sues Faden for breach of copyright. In total it would take two 60 minute classes to do this, with students preparing the trial at home between classes. Here’s the lesson plan, there are also educator’s notes and resources to go with it. Thank you Electronic Frontier Foundation!

Unfortunately, Norway and most of Europe don’t have Fair Use, so totally cribbing this lesson plan probably won’t do for Thursday’s class, although the topic is copyright and remix culture. In fact, I’m pretty sure that while A Fair(y) Use Tale would be legal in the US (at least, it should be), it would be clearly illegal in Norway. In Norway we don’t have fair use, but we do have “sitatrett” or “the right to cite”, which allows quotation of other sources without permission, but expressly forbids twisting the meaning of whatever is quoted. The quotation has to be “loyal” to the source. You can criticise the source, but not by taking the quote out of context unfairly. (Gisle Hannemyrs Lommejuss for digitale medier provides a good overview in the section on “avgrensninger i opphavsretten”. See also the section on “appropriasjonskunst”.) Fair use, on the other hand, expressly permits parody and says that “transformative use” of material is one of the proofs that the use is actually “fair use”. I’m not a lawyer, btw, and to be honest, the details of all this are extremely confusing. And in a class like ours, the international aspects are crazy. We have exchange students from Germany, Spain, Italy, Hong Kong, France, Slovenia and more, mostly just here for a semester. What if one of these makes a remix while in Norway, but uses US material and publishes it on a US server, and then goes back to their home country which may have different laws again? To complicate things further: what if an exchange student makes their remix in their own language, while in Norway, using content from the US, Norway and China or Italy or whatever, and publishes it on a US server? I asked a lawyer friend about this and she just laughed and said oh no, don’t even go there. So frankly, I have no idea.

So today’s class is about copyright, anyway. We’ve read the first 100 pages of Lawrence Lessig’s Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive
in the Hybrid Economy
, and I’ve also recommended that students watch one of Lessig’s talks, such as his TED talk on Laws that choke creativity, as well as one of the several good documentaries on the effects of copyright laws and remix culture – Johnsen, Andreas, Ralf Christensen and Henrik Moltke’s Good Copy Bad Copy (2007) or Brett Gaylor’s RIP: A Remix Manifesto (2009)

We also need to discuss some of the entirely practical issues we have to deal with: how do we deal with copyright in the videos we’re making ourselves?

We’ll definitely discuss Creative Commons licensing, and the public domain, of course. And we’ll look at sources for Creative Commons licenced images (you can search for CC licenced photos at Flickr or Google images – and a lot of old images in “The Commons” at Flickr have no copyright restrictions (check each photo though), videos (blip.tv) and music (find and sample music at ccMixster, or at Jamendo, create your own at jamstudio.com) – or check out one of the lists of sources for CC licenced material.

For works in the public domain (“i det fri) see for instance this list of a few resources from TeachingCopyright.org.

Then there’s also the simple method of asking the person who created the image, video or text for permission. Since YouTube still doesn’t have a simple way of licencing videos, this is what you have to do to use most YouTube videos. Mostly, people will be happy to say yes.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “remix culture: copyright

  1. AnneMarie Cunningham

    RT @jilltxt: Today’s Remix Culture class: copyright, Lessig, fair use, "sitatrett", creative commons,++ http://bit.ly/Mt8T6 @fncll

  2. Tama

    If your students need any extra resources for finding CC and public domain licensed material, I’ve collected a bunch of resources and tools which might be useful here: http://bit.ly/tamawiki

  3. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Tama, this is brilliant; thank you so much!!

  4. Espen Andersen

    Cool stuff, Jill. Plus the fact that you are using your blog directly for class, something I only recently started doing.

  5. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Thanks, Espen — and yes, some semesters I set up a separate blog for classes, but actually I quite like the discipline of writing a post that will both work for students and for a more general audience. And my frequency of blogging has been so pathetic of late that this way at least I have a couple of posts a week 🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.