[VIdeo of the conference is also available at http://bambuser.com/v/3110251]

Remediation of the Social is the international conference that is the highlight of the ELMCIP project, and we’re excited to be here! We not only brought the whole Electronic Literature Research Group from UiB, we also brought eleven of our e-lit students. Look at everyone arrived at the airport:

Actually I didn’t arrive with the team, I showed up this morning, still in time for the start of the conference though. The auditorium at the Edinburgh College of Art has stuccoed ceilings and many familiar faces from the e-lit and new media conferences I’ve attended in the last fifteen years, and many new faces I don’t yet know.

Simon Biggs welcomes us to the first day of the final conference of the ELMCIP project, Remediating the Social.

Nick Montfort gives the keynote (documentation, and soon, the video, are available on the ELMCIP Knowledge Base), and his theme (as I read it) is about fun, and about how programming and creating programmable art and literature can and should be fun and accessible. He shows us an early television commercial for the Vic-20 computer, emphasising that it was “not just for games” – it had “a real computer keyboard”. Next, an Australian commercial for the Commodore 64 that I’ve shown students as well. This ad is pretty funny, but notice particularly the wonderful juxtapositions: look at these fun things we could do! We could go to a waterpark – or we could program! Back then, programming was seen (and marketed) as fun, easy and an obvious thing you’d want to do with your computer. The demoscene is another example of this, a wonderful subculture of  young people who challenge each other to make their computers generate cool graphics and “demos”. “The Popular Demo” is an example of how the demoscene is about fun, and very different from the apocalyptic aesthetics of most computer games (I’d say there are plenty of exceptions to this – and I’m sure Nick would agree.)

Next, Nick fires up a C64 emulator and proceeds to teach us enough BASIC programming to write the 10 print program that he and a pile of other scholars have just written a book dissecting. I am definitely showing students this bit of the lecture for my next run of my BASIC class. Happily all this is being videotaped. All this will lead, in a moment, to the program that is also the title of the book Nick and nine co-authors are releasing in a couple of weeks from MIT Press: 10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10.

Scott Rettberg steps in for Rita Raley (who is stuck in lower Manhattan without power or internet or access to the flight she had tickets on) as respondent, and uses the example of collaborative writing as a counter example to Nick’s programming examples. E-lit authors also collaborate and have fun, for instance as Nick and Scott did in Implementation, or more programmatically, as Scott and then many, many other authors rewrote and recoded Nick’s generative poem Taroko Gorge.

Nick Montfort and Scott Rettberg discussing the Taroko Gorge remixes, and Nick’s keynote on programming as fun.

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Programming for fun, together! Nick Montfort’s keynote at Remediating the Social

  1. nick

    Jill, thanks for the writeup! You mentioned:

    “The Popular Demo” is an example of how the demoscene is about fun, and very different from the apocalyptic aesthetics of most computer games (I’d say there are plenty of exceptions to this – and I’m sure Nick would agree.)

    Yes, there are exceptions on both sides – industrial and dark demos, casual games in which the sun always shines. But I think the (deserved) stereotype of “hardcore” games is related to warfare and wasteland-like environments; they’re made to be threatening. Demos, on the other hand, often show positive scenes of exuberance. I think they show a positive and at times utopian alternative.

    1. Jill

      Thanks for that clarification, Nick, and it’s an interesting contrast.

  2. […] Walker Rettberg liveblogged my keynote (bringing back another wonderful historical tradition in digital media!) and there was also some […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.