Just before my six year old daughter fell asleep she told me the day’s woes: “The spÂ* said that B. was a princess, and he didn’t like that, and so he pushed S. so hard that she fell on top of me and hurt my foot!” I looked serious and said “Oh” slowly and that was all that was needed, but inside I was thinking of gender and what it must mean when from the age of six girls have to put up with violent boys as a matter of fact, and six-year-old boys are already indoctrinated to think that being called a princess is the ultimate dishonour. And Norway is one of the least sexist countries in the world.

* I don’t know the English for spÂ. Kids fold them out of paper and use them as fortune telling machines, opening them and shutting them according to numbers chosen by the person to be “spÂdd”.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “pushing

  1. Liz

    When I was a kid, we called them “fortune tellers.” Klutz press, however, has a book about them (which my kids have, and love), which calls them “Cootie Catchers”.

    http://www.klutz.com/product_details.cfm?productID=4118

  2. meredith

    Yes, we called them fortune tellers too.

  3. Francolis Lachance

    Inverted the delightful folded paper artworks present four-chambered receptacles (great for holding paper clips!). In the origami books and sites they are called “salt cellars”.
    http://origami.kvi.nl/models/toys/fortune/fortune1.gif

    I have used them in language teaching since beneath a flap one could place a complementary piece of information that was coordinated with the design (e.g. Arabic numerals and their lexical signs).

    I wonder if such a toy or educational device could be adapted to gender …. a game where depending on the selection made by the fortune teller one would have to speak and act as a princess, as a witch, as an amazon sea captain, … imaginative play to disarm stereotypes. Or with inflected languages that mark grammatical gender, other possibilities arise.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]