Tonight is the night of the Meltzer Dinner, where the prize will be officially announced. It’s Lauritz Meltzer‘s birthday today, you see, and he not only left his considerable fortune to the Meltzer Foundation, which is able to give out well over 10 million kroner a year in research funding, he also put a caveat in his will: The money would fund research at the University of Bergen, if Norway managed to set up a University of Bergen within ten years of his death. The university was founded five years after Meltzer died, in 1948, as the second university in Norway after Oslo. So thank you Meltzer!

I hadn’t realised there was an annual dinner to go along with the funding announcements, but this year I’m invited, as one of the prize winners. As far as I’ve gleaned, all the full professors at the University are invited. Not all attend – one professor I talked to laughingly said he’d been protesting such an offensively bourgeois use of potential research funds since the seventies, and certainly couldn’t start going now. Actually I’m inventing a little of that – I’m not even sure whether the dinner was held in the seventies, but it’s much more fun to think of it as an Ancient, Secret Ritual, a legacy of the academia of earlier times, something protested by the generation before me but that I’m free to attend merrily due to being born in a fortunate decade. I imagine all the full professors (none of us young associate professors of course) wearing tuxedos and evening gowns, and giving erudite yet witty speeches and wearing fat, official I-have-a-PhD-from-the-University-of-Bergen rings. It’s to be held at the SAS Radisson Hotel Norge, which, being traditionally (though perhaps not currently) the best hotel in town, suggests at least some degree of splendor. On the other hand, C. said he’d seen photos, and some people were wearing suits, but others only lusekofter. Which might be interpreted as dressing down or as dressing with national pride. I’ve found clear evidence that men wear suits to this dinner (1, 2). It’s a little less clear what most women would wear.

If it’s simply a dinner, I can obviously wear my plain yet perfectly serviceable black dress, perhaps with a nice scarf or necklace or something. If it’s an Ancient and Secret Ritual, it’s clear I’ll need a new dress. Which is really the conclusion I want to reach, anyway, so let’s go with that theory.

Synn¯ve always looks incredibly groovy, so I asked her where to go to buy a suitable dress. She suggested KlÊr on Bryggen if I wanted to look like a hip, 30-something-year-old researcher (though she warned me they would also have hip 40-something-year-old clothes there – ooh, tricky distinction that) or Twisted if I wanted a more overtly counter-cultural look. So I’ve completed my most pressing work duties, dusted off my master card and I’m off to Bryggen.

[Update: Got a lovely brown linen dress by NygÂrdsanna at KlÊr. I love it.)


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.