I’ve been offered to opportunity to apply for qualification funding – funding for research travel and so on that’s likely to help me publish more so that I eventually qualify for full professorship. Which would rock. So I’m trying to figure out what I should do. The standard thing, what they sort of expect, is a year being a visiting scholar somewhere. That’s impossible for me for family reasons, though I think I’m going to wangle a month in Perth with my daughter (and my now-fiancÈ-then-husband (!) will be able to be there for about half that time) and that I can do maybe a three-week thing somewhere later. I can apply for conference funding too, I think.

So my question to you, my dear blogosphere, is: what should I do? What would be the best places to visit, conferences to go to and so on?

And of course, what the heck is my project? I’ll have finished the book on blogging by September 1, so what am I going to spend the next ten months of my sabbatical on? Another book? More blogging? Participatory culture? Return to the distributed narrative project I wanted to do a book on? Or has time moved on since then – I’m thinking participatory narrative might be a more interesting concept these days. Who cares if it’s distributed, the point now is that you can barely tell a story without the audience getting into it and telling half of it too.

It’s hugely luxurious getting to plan how to spend a whole year’s time and even, quite likely, some money too. At times like these I adore academia.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

10 thoughts on “planning my sabbatical

  1. jo

    hi jill

    if you go to perth, you should definitely meet up with tama leaver (http://ponderance.blogspot.com/) and christina chau (http://cacofonix.arts.uwa.edu.au/node/312). they’re both at uwa.

    have a great christmas. jo

  2. Jill

    Thanks Jo – I read Tama Leaver’s blog, but didn’t know about Christina Chau!

  3. Francois Lachance

    Jill,

    No matter where you will be located in the flesh, I’m sure you will be connected electronically with a dispersed community of readers, researchers and fans.

    Re: participatory versus distributed narrative

    I wonder if a turn towards the problematics of narration might be inn the cards. There is the question of digital decay or what Barthes called “fading” that authors in any media encounter. Planning for dispersion is one strategy for coping with loss. Overt calls to participation appears to be the converse: elements of lost fragments are called together for reanimation. I think these concerns connect with your keen and abiding interest in the process and culture of blogging. Blog as repository and as conduit of samples.

    And for some reason I find myself suggesting a visit to a perfume museum say in Grasse or Paris. I must be the notion of sample that is wafting through. Just a hunch that a history of scent will provide a wealth of analogies with the trade in cultural bits and bytes.

  4. JoseAngel

    Participatory narrative, please, or interactive, call it what you will. And the specific ways in which this interaction creates identities, insiders, outsiders, a variety of selves… the remediation of self and other. øSounds good? maybe I’ll take it myself!

  5. Espen

    The idea of a sabattical is radically changed in the age of digital communications. The trouble of physical relocation used to be made up for by the privilege of seclusion from local work obligations, but these days we do most of our work online, not necessarily in our physical offices. What should be negotiated these days is probably not the physical sabbatical, but the digital one. Otherwise, one could end up with the trouble of relocation, without the necessary break from most of our standard workday that a sabbatical used to ensure.

    Is it possible to fully enjoy a sabbatical if it does not include the leave of absence from one’s work email?

  6. JoseAngel

    But would we WANT that? Oh well, I guess I’m too far gone.

  7. Christina Chau

    hello, even though I will have finised my honours by the time you come to Perth I think that it’s wonderful that you’ll be wandering through the halls of UWA.

  8. Jill

    Yes!!! And I got the funding, so looks all set to go!!

  9. Tama Leaver

    And since I seem to have become a semi-permanent fixture at UWA (in some form or another) I look forward to seeing you around the Perth as well! 🙂

  10. Jill

    🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.