I’m teaching a 5 credit (ECTS) course on Communicating with Social Media this autumn (in Norwegian!). I’m really excited about the course. It’s a short, intensive course – three full days followed by independent work, so should be ideal for people who are busy doing other things most of the time. And it will be very practical. Students will be graded on a portfolio to consist of:

  • A profile on a social website (e.g. Facebook or elsewhere) for an organisation or company. The organisation can be fictional and the profile set up simply for practice, or students may choose to create a profile for an organisation or company they’re affiliated with.
  • A blog with posts discussing topics dealt with in the course. The blog must have at least ten posts. Students will select three posts for assessment, with a minimum of 1200 words in total. One of these posts must discuss choices made in creating the organisation or company profile in the first part of the portfolio, and must also outline a plan for how the organisation’s social media strategy should be developed.

Here’s the complete info on DIKULT110: Kommunikasjon i sosiale medium (in Norwegian).

I’m excited both because I love the topic and because I think these assignments will be useful and interesting – and I’m looking forward to seeing what we can do with this. (I just realised we’ll have to have some ethical rules – probably no setting up fake sites for Statoil, for instance. Hm. What else could go wrong?)

The planning of dates has begun. What do you think would be the ideal time for a short, intensive course like this? Early in the semester – say the last week of August? Or later in the semester?

Any other comments or ideas? Would you be interested in taking a course like this?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

10 thoughts on “planning a new course: communication in social media

  1. Mathias Klang

    RT @jilltxt: Teaching an intensive, three day course this autumn: Kommunikasjon i sosiale medium. Interested? http://jilltxt.net/?p=2465

  2. cecilie

    Early so i can follow it!

  3. Mathias Klang

    I would love to attend and I could do the Norwegian (if you are not to picky about my spelling) but its the Bergen thing that’s difficult 🙂

  4. Karianne A. Aam

    RT @jilltxt: Teaching an intensive, three day course this autumn: Kommunikasjon i sosiale medium. Interested? http://jilltxt.net/?p=2465

  5. Forrest theMediaDude

    jill/txt » planning a new course: communication in social media http://bit.ly/aDTLAt

  6. Bankruptcy Attorney

    jill/txt » planning a new course: communication in social media http://bit.ly/9ZYF3w

  7. Louise

    I’d love it, and I wish I was a student…

  8. Stig Morten

    What’s your comment on this? Is BI the first?

  9. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Oh, interesting, Stig Morten, thanks for the tip off! There are other courses on social media, but we’re all among the first.

    Cecilie, the course will probably start in week 35 – we’ll meet Monday, Wednesday, Friday that week and then there’ll be independent work for three weeks, with meetings at the end of that and the portfolio due the following week.

  10. KDS

    It looks like social networks might be mined in various ways in the near future, see this conference.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]