Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni art autocorrect Blogging book ChatGPT conferences data analysis digital art electronic literature ELMCIP environmental art exhibition flies Gephi history journalister LLMs London machine vision market literature motherhood network analysis norsk open access Pierre Huyghe publication publications research science fiction self-representation selfies social media Surveillance talks teaching tracking trip report twitter UiB visualisation
Uncategorised

planning a new course: communication in social media

Jill10 Comments

I’m teaching a 5 credit (ECTS) course on Communicating with Social Media this autumn (in Norwegian!). I’m really excited about the course. It’s a short, intensive course – three full days followed by independent work, so should be ideal for people who are busy doing other things most of the time. And it will be very practical. Students will be graded on a portfolio to consist of:

  • A profile on a social website (e.g. Facebook or elsewhere) for an organisation or company. The organisation can be fictional and the profile set up simply for practice, or students may choose to create a profile for an organisation or company they’re affiliated with.
  • A blog with posts discussing topics dealt with in the course. The blog must have at least ten posts. Students will select three posts for assessment, with a minimum of 1200 words in total. One of these posts must discuss choices made in creating the organisation or company profile in the first part of the portfolio, and must also outline a plan for how the organisation’s social media strategy should be developed.

Here’s the complete info on DIKULT110: Kommunikasjon i sosiale medium (in Norwegian).

I’m excited both because I love the topic and because I think these assignments will be useful and interesting – and I’m looking forward to seeing what we can do with this. (I just realised we’ll have to have some ethical rules – probably no setting up fake sites for Statoil, for instance. Hm. What else could go wrong?)

The planning of dates has begun. What do you think would be the ideal time for a short, intensive course like this? Early in the semester – say the last week of August? Or later in the semester?

Any other comments or ideas? Would you be interested in taking a course like this?

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

10 thoughts on “planning a new course: communication in social media”

  1. Mathias Klang

    RT @jilltxt: Teaching an intensive, three day course this autumn: Kommunikasjon i sosiale medium. Interested? http://jilltxt.net/?p=2465

  2. cecilie

    Early so i can follow it!

  3. Mathias Klang

    I would love to attend and I could do the Norwegian (if you are not to picky about my spelling) but its the Bergen thing that’s difficult 🙂

  4. Karianne A. Aam

    RT @jilltxt: Teaching an intensive, three day course this autumn: Kommunikasjon i sosiale medium. Interested? http://jilltxt.net/?p=2465

  5. Forrest theMediaDude

    jill/txt » planning a new course: communication in social media http://bit.ly/aDTLAt

  6. Bankruptcy Attorney

    jill/txt » planning a new course: communication in social media http://bit.ly/9ZYF3w

  7. Louise

    I’d love it, and I wish I was a student…

  8. Stig Morten

    What’s your comment on this? Is BI the first?

  9. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Oh, interesting, Stig Morten, thanks for the tip off! There are other courses on social media, but we’re all among the first.

    Cecilie, the course will probably start in week 35 – we’ll meet Monday, Wednesday, Friday that week and then there’ll be independent work for three weeks, with meetings at the end of that and the portfolio due the following week.

  10. KDS

    It looks like social networks might be mined in various ways in the near future, see this conference.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.