MIT Press requested a photo of Hilde and me to use in promoting our World of Warcraft anthology (which you can already preorder on Amazon!). Makes sense. Sure. But both Hilde and I enjoy having our photos taken about as much as we enjoy going to the dentist.

Hilde Corneliussen and Jill Walker Rettberg

Fortunately the university has a photographer especially for these sorts of occasions. And fortunately, digital photography allowed us to weed out the horrible photos and pick this really fairly nice one. That’s Hilde on the left and me on the right, in case you’re wondering.

I don’t think I’ll show you the one of me on my own though. Oh dear.

By the way, if you want to use this photo to promote our beloved book in some way go ahead, steal use it, we want you to.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Ooh, we went to the official university photographer”

  1. Christian Bech

    What’s the license?

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

    ?

  2. Jill Walker Rettberg

    It’s probably copyrighted to the University of Bergen, but they definitely want it used for press and promotion purposes. So not strictly speaking a CC licence, but please reuse it. Please don’t chop off our heads and glue them onto elephants or anything like that.

  3. Gro

    Vous etËs trËs belles! God tur og god jul, vi sees i
    februar (for singstar-revansj!)

  4. Christian Bech

    I was kind af hoping for : to Remix ó to adapt the work 😉

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]