Oh wow. I just received a copy of the New Media Reader, edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort, and wow. I mean, I had seen the table of contents and thought, basically, wow, but I think it’s just seeing it now and realising that it actually includes such a wonderful selection of what I think is important. Not just The Cyborg Manifesto and Ted Nelson on hypertext, but a selection of Oulipo poetry, seminal articles on GUI from the 70s and 80s, an excerpt from Understanding Comics, Moulthrop, Joyce, Aarseth, Bolter, Berners-Lee, Turkle, Laurel, and something called “Cybernated Art” by Nam June Paik written in 1966 (!) and other alluring things I’ve not even heard of and a CD-ROM with games, art, videos of demos of interfaces and computers through the last decades and the essays are annotated and interlinked and and and and…

I’d been thinking that at US$45 it was just too expensive to consider, but my first glance at this suggests it’s the only book my students will need to buy next semester. Wow.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “new media reader

  1. jon

    “Wow”. That’s a jill/txt-ism.
    But the book sounds great. I shall have to see if it’s available in the academic bookstore here at SU.

  2. Hot Soup Girl

    Methinks an italics tag may not have been closed here…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]