By Norwegian law, making copies of media for your own private use has always been legal. Right now, downloading music or movies is legal, but uploading isn’t. Now a suggested law will make it illegal to download music (except from close friends, if I’ve understood it correctly), which I can at least see the point of, sort of, but far worse: the law will make it illegal to make even private copies of that CD you bought (say, so you can listen to the music on your mp3-player) if the CD is copy protected.

Right.

So now I’ll buy a CD and find I can’t listen to it except on that trashy old CD player I never use any more? The funniest part of this is the explanation that you’re allowed to make a copy for your own private use on relevant equipment (the quotes below are from this PDF):

Etter forslaget vil omg?•else av vernede kopisperrer v?¶re forbudt. Forbudet mot omg?•else skal sikre at det ikke skjer en ukontrollert og ??konomisk skadelig spredning av vernet innhold. Det skal likevel v?¶re tillatt ?• omg?• sperrer dersom dette er n??dvendig for privat avspilling p?• relevant utstyr. F.eks. vil en CD-plate kunne omg?•s for ?• spille av platen i bilstereoen, da en CD-spiller vil v?¶re relevant avspiller for en CD-plate, men sperren kan ikke omg?•s for ?• legge platen over p?• en MP3-spiller, da en slik spiller ikke kan anses for ?• v?¶re relevant for en CD-plate.

I’ll have to translate that last bit:

For instance, you can circumvent the copy protection on a CD so you can play it in your car stereo, since a CD-player will be a relevant player for a CD, but you can’t break the copy protection so you can transfer the music to an MP3-player, because such a player can’t be seen as relevant to a CD.

They added extra protection for being able to play the CD in your car stereo:

Det vil ikke v?¶re adgang til ?• omg?• en kopisperre for ?• kopiere til privat bruk. Omg?•else er bare lov om det er n??dvendig for privat avspilling p?• relevant utstyr. I den grad det er n??dvendig ?• kopiere platen for ?• f?• spilt den av, f.eks. i bilstereoen, vil ogs?• det v?¶re tillatt.

which means

It will not be legal to break a copy protection to copy for your own private use. Circumvention is only permitted if it is necessary for private playing on relevant equiptment. If it is necessary to copy the CD in order to play it, for instance on your car stereo, copying is permitted.

Isn’t that an astoundingly clich?©ed example of Why We Need Young People In Government?

If the industry start copyprotecting more media, the law might get changed, the authorities say. If. They are insane.

I have to say it’s just as freaky to see R??d Ungdom – the communist youth organisation – dressing up as iPods for a demonstration against this law. That’s right: the communists are advertising for Apple.

[Read more: Elektronisk forpost Norge / Cory Doctorow’s excellent explanation of why technical restrictions on our media are dangerous (read my notes from his talk, Scott’s more carefully edited notes or watch the video)


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. Lars

    How on earth will this law ever be enforced? I mean, Norwegian police are even hesitant to give people speeding tickets. Try this workaround: Break the copy protection to make a copy of your CD, for playing in your car (or wherever). Now, make MP3s off this un-copy-protected copy. Legal? Pfah. I don’t buy CDs. I buy music. Talk about confusing the media and the message…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.