I’m reading Mrs Dalloway (it’s wonderful) and as in every British novel set in upper class 19th or early 20th century Britain they keep talking about how much people have a year. To keep his Indian divorcee, her children, and himself, Peter Walsh needs a job that will pay at least £500, he thinks, which is the same sum as Woolf herself believes a woman needs a year to write, £500 a year and a room of her own. I’ve always wondered how much £500 a year is, and it’s not excessive, it turns out, certainly not enough to keep servants today, though you’d be able to afford a room and kitchen of your own, and payments on your student debts too: in 1923 £500 had the same purchase power as £17949.01 today. That’s about what they pay us while we’re working on our PhDs in Norway, so yes, it’s enough to write.

You’ll find more converters for historical values of money in many different currencies at a very useful collection called Current Value of Old Money. There’s even a converter for the historical value of Norwegian kroner, from 1865 to today, kindly provided by Statistisk SentralbyrÂ, which really has a very impressive website.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “money

  1. hanna

    Goodness, £17949 is considerably more than UK PhD students are paid; the typical salary for a PhD student in Britain is currently £9000 per year! (People are, in fact, very excited about this salary — last year £8000 was the norm.)

    An aside: while at Post-Invasion Poetics last night, I overheard a student comment that his advisor, one of the poets present, “really is Mrs. Dalloway….”

  2. Bill

    Ye gods! At my graduate institution, the take-home pay was only about US$800/month (nothing during summers) and that’s with teaching three courses (one/quarter). Granted this was 5-10 years ago, but still….

    Of course, my *current* institution is even worse: the graduate stipend is a mammoth $5000/year. But these are only masters students, who are often lucky to find any support at all.

  3. Jill

    They said she was Mrs Dalloway? God, I hope no one ever says that about me. She’s so closed tight, for all her wonderful thoughts and feelings… A warning more than something to aspire to.

    As for the money, I know, Norwegians doing PhDs get paid more than just about anywhere else, but they’re also on average older and have studied and worked for longer before they get the grant. Look:

    • We generally already have student debts of well over £17949. I did, most of my friends do. You have to start paying those debts down when you finish your MA, so that’s £150 a month right there. The student debt’s not for tuition, which is free here, but for living costs. Few continue to live at home after twenty, many move at 18, and as a culture we assume the individual, with state support, is responsible for his or her own education, rather than parents paying, as is common in many cultures. We love being independent. Though the student loan system’s pretty damn good compared to other countries you still end up with a lot of debt. And there are no grants like in the US where very good students get their living costs paid.
    • When we start our PhDs we’ve already been at university for six or seven years. I know this is different from country to country, but here you need an MA to start a PhD. That takes six years, at least, in the humanities. It’s during your MA you starve and work as a waitress, you’ve had enough of that by the time you’re done.
    • A PhD fellowship is treated as a recruitment position here so you’re not a student.
    • It’s damn hard to get a PhD grant.
    • It’s possible that the cost of living in Norway is higher than in other countries. We keep getting told this, but it doesn’t seem to me that US or British groceries and rent are any cheaper than what we pay here, so I don’t know. Australia’s a bit cheaper, especially groceries and clothes.
    • It’s just a different system. There are far fewer people doing doctoral degrees here than in Anglo countries, though this is quite likely to change. I suspect we’ll move to an Anglo system in a few years: shorter degrees, more of ’em.

    With my huge student loan, a daughter and being nearly thirty by the time I qualified, I sure wouldn’t have taken the risk of doing a PhD if it had meant incurring even more debt and continuing to live on the pittance I’d been surviving on as a student.

    Post-Invasion Poetics? Goodness.

  4. jdh fjdh fjdf hdjh

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.