Skimming through a paper on cultural differences in editing the Wikipedia, I am baffled at the following:

The higher the MAS [masculinity index] of a country, the more contributions in the categories Add Information and Clarify Information are found. Although we did not predict this outcome, a possible explanation could be that in countries with a relatively higher MAS (e.g., Japan), success and progress are more important than in countries with a lower MAS (Hofstede, 1991).

I hadn’t heard of masculinity indexes before, so obviously had to re-skim the bit of the paper explaining them:

Masculinity, according to Hofstede, “pertains to societies in which social gender roles are clearly distinct (i.e., men are supposed to be assertive, tough, and focused on material success whereas women are supposed to be more modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life). Femininity, in contrast, “pertains to societies in which social gender roles overlap (i.e., both men and women are supposed to be modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life)” (Hofstede, 1991, pp. 82-83).

The Masculinity Index (MAS) describes the extent to which a country tends to be masculine. In countries with a high MAS, it is valued to be ambitious, successful, and assertive (Hofstede, 1991). In countries with a low MAS, relationships with other people and the preservation of the environment are important (Hofstede, 1991).

A little odd, but odder still: this index was based on observations made (of IBM employees in 70 countries) between 1967 and 1973. I should jolly well hope gender relations have come along a bit since them.

It’s interesting to see any kind of cross-cultural analysis of wikipedia use – though surely there are more recent measures of cultural differences than the ones this paper uses, from 1967-73.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Machine Vision

Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: An Experimental Mixed Methods Workshop

Call for submissions to a workshop, Bergen, Norway
Workshop dates: 15-17 August 2022
Proposals due: 15 June

The Machine Vision in Everyday Life project invites proposals for an interdisciplinary workshop using qualitative approaches and digital methods to analyse how machine vision is represented in art, science fiction, games, social media and other forms of cultural and aesthetic expression.

Digital Humanities Machine Vision

What do different machine vision technologies do in fiction and art?

For the Machine Vision in Everyday Life project we’ve analysed how machine vision technologies are portrayed and used in 500 works of fiction and art, including 77 digital games, 190 digital artworks and 233 movies, novels and other narratives. You can browse […]

AI and algorithmic culture Presentations

My talk on caring AIs in recent sci-fi novels

I’m giving a talk at an actual f2f academic conference today, Critical Borders, Radical Re(visions) of AI, in Cambridge. I was particularly excited to see this conference because it’s organised by the people who edited AI Narratives A History of Imaginative Thinking […]