Sexist mac adJean titles her post on this My computer is just like me (not): The new Mac ads are even worse than the old ones – so not only are the Windows and Mac users rather white men of two rather clichÈed stereotypes, they compare the home videos they edited. And guess what, they’re women. The Mac user’s is pretty and well-dressed and described as “professional”, whereas the Windows user’s is a man dressed as a frumpy woman. This makes me want to switch to, oh I don’t know, Linux, I suppose. If you were in any doubt that men are the default and women the aberration (or, on occasion, the creation or possession of men as in this ad), you might want to note how men’s naked bodies are “human anatomy” while women’s naked bodies are “female anatomy” (via Martin).


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “mac ads all about reinforcing stereotypes?

  1. b¯rge

    I’ve recently switched to Linux, and it was much easier than I thought. I’m dualbooting Ubuntu LInux and Windows XP, but I’ve never felt the need to boot Windows again after installing Ubuntu some months ago! If you, or anyone, would like help on switching I’m writing about at over at Jeg, en Linux-bruker? (Norwegian).

  2. Elinesca

    Actually… it’s all a joke… the woman is a very famous model, Giselle Bundchen (or something like that).
    I thought it was funny.. I wouldn’t if I didn’t know who the woman was, though:-)

  3. Jill

    I don’t know that it really helps that the woman is a supermodel… Ah well.

  4. […] Update: In response to a bit of discussion going on about the ads reinforcing stereotypes, mainly started by Jill, who kindly linked to my post here: there is that, sure – the Mac is one sort of vaguely urban, effortlessly cool American guy, the PC is another, deeply unattractive, old economy nerd sort of American guy. Yes, theyíre ístereotypesí, and so is the supermodel in the ëbetterí ad. […]

  5. H&T

    A colleague of mine reckons that the ‘get a mac’ ads ‘jumped the shark’ some time ago. But I totally agree the tenor is unfortunate, even allowing for tongues that might (possibly) be deeply embedded in cheeks. At bigqueer.com (where one commentator has suggested that in addition to being sexist, the ads are ‘transhating’ is made) they’re doing a little survey FYI.

  6. Jill

    If you don’t get the problem with the Mac ads, PLEASE go read Jean’s new post that dissects them more. And thanks, H&T, for that link – yeah, clearly not very complimentary to trans…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]