Students with at least 60 ECTS in Digital Culture at UiB can apply for this NORDPLUS course in Finland Aug 20-24 this year – you get a paid trip, fun and stimulating discussions and 15 ECTS for it. Our course code for it will be DIKULT252.  There’ll be three students from each of the partners in the Nordic Digital Culture Network, so from us at the University of Bergen, from Blekinge Institute of Technology in Sweden, from the IT University in Copenhagen and from the Universities of Jyväskylä and Turku in Finland. If you’re interested in applying, get in touch with Scott Rettberg (scott.rettberg@uib.no) who is our contact person for the course, as we’ll be running a small workshop on how to write an abstract for something like this. The application deadline is April 1.

Here are some excerpts from the plan for the course (not yet finally approved by the faculty administration and published on the web, sorry)

Topic in 2012: Digital Materialities (in a broad sense; physical artefacts related to digital content platforms; game packaging and such); digital practices affecting physical environments; physical interaction with media; preservation of cultural heritage etc.; the topic is not meant to be strongly restrictive, good papers may be accepted even though not directly related to the topic.

Application procedure: All undergraduate Digital Culture students with 60+ credits are eligible to apply. Students should submit an abstract of approximately 500 words describing their bachelor ́s thesis project, by April 1.
Selection will be based on the quality of the abstracts and on prior performance in Digital Culture courses. Only courses already completed the previous semester will be included in the 60 ECTS Digital Culture.
Three students from UiB Digital Culture will be selected and will receive Nordplus stipends for travel expenses. These students only will be enrolled in the course.

The summer seminar is a weeklong course including students and faculty from all of the participating institutions.
Students will submit and present a paper-in-progress and work with students from other institutions during the week of the joint seminar.
After the seminar, students will work with UiB faculty during three obligatory meetings in the fall term to prepare their papers for evaluation and publication submission. These meetings will be led by the UiB faculty member and include the three participating students at UiB. The meetings will be workshops focused on revisions of the students’ papers.

Assessment will be based on a final paper, approximately 5000 words in length, and a final presentation. The paper will serve as the BA thesis for undergraduates enrolled in the course. One grade will be assigned based on the paper and the oral presentation. The oral presentation can adjust the paper grade by one letter grade.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.