I just applied for the job at comparative literature. Yeah, I know, when I mentioned it last night I didn’t really mean to apply, but after sleeping on it and having a chat with a colleague, I decided to do it. I think I’d really enjoy the opportunity to focus more narrowly on the literary aspects of networked literature, and I actually really like the fact that it’s got a time limit so I could come back here (or elsewhere) when I’d spent three and a half years buried in the literary and teaching poems and literary theory and gender studies. I’d have to get leave from my permanent position here, to be willing to accept the job, but there are people here who could easily step into my shoes for 3.5 years, so leave might work just fine.

I think it’s obvious that electronic literature should be in the curriculum for comparative literature students, so it’s a logical step for me to apply for a job at a comparative literature department. Of course, so far there hasn’t been any electronic literature at comp. lit. in Bergen, so I’m looking forward to reading the committee’s begrunnelse, their two page summary of what they think of the publications I sent in and of my suitedness to the job. I sent in my most literary publications for the selection committee: my PhD thesis, my piece for the AoIR annual on distributed narrative (the link is to an earlier version than the one in the Annual), the feral hypertext literature piece, my weblog definition, my essay on second person address and the old one on afternoon. My weakest point (assuming they don’t try to argue that electronic literature isn’t literature and so I’m not qualified) is that I haven’t done much work specificially within gender theory. Ah well, it will be interesting to see how it goes.

And my goodness there’s something so luxurious about handing in an application for an academic job less than 24 hours after first seeing the advertisement, while having spent most of the day doing completely different things. The joys of an updated CV and reasonably organised publications — and of course the lack of anxiety that without that particular job, one will starve. So much nicer than the anguish that went into my last job application!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “job application

  1. Gro

    I cross my fingers for you getting the job! must be strange though,,
    getting back to where we once started our studentlife… with the
    same people still there.

  2. Jill

    Yeah, I bet it would be weird – but interesting and no doubt educational in many ways. As I said, I really like the idea of doing it for a period of time.

  3. Lesley

    Wow. Wish it was me. I’m going to be living this one vicariously.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.