I just applied for the job at comparative literature. Yeah, I know, when I mentioned it last night I didn’t really mean to apply, but after sleeping on it and having a chat with a colleague, I decided to do it. I think I’d really enjoy the opportunity to focus more narrowly on the literary aspects of networked literature, and I actually really like the fact that it’s got a time limit so I could come back here (or elsewhere) when I’d spent three and a half years buried in the literary and teaching poems and literary theory and gender studies. I’d have to get leave from my permanent position here, to be willing to accept the job, but there are people here who could easily step into my shoes for 3.5 years, so leave might work just fine.

I think it’s obvious that electronic literature should be in the curriculum for comparative literature students, so it’s a logical step for me to apply for a job at a comparative literature department. Of course, so far there hasn’t been any electronic literature at comp. lit. in Bergen, so I’m looking forward to reading the committee’s begrunnelse, their two page summary of what they think of the publications I sent in and of my suitedness to the job. I sent in my most literary publications for the selection committee: my PhD thesis, my piece for the AoIR annual on distributed narrative (the link is to an earlier version than the one in the Annual), the feral hypertext literature piece, my weblog definition, my essay on second person address and the old one on afternoon. My weakest point (assuming they don’t try to argue that electronic literature isn’t literature and so I’m not qualified) is that I haven’t done much work specificially within gender theory. Ah well, it will be interesting to see how it goes.

And my goodness there’s something so luxurious about handing in an application for an academic job less than 24 hours after first seeing the advertisement, while having spent most of the day doing completely different things. The joys of an updated CV and reasonably organised publications — and of course the lack of anxiety that without that particular job, one will starve. So much nicer than the anguish that went into my last job application!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “job application”

  1. Gro

    I cross my fingers for you getting the job! must be strange though,,
    getting back to where we once started our studentlife… with the
    same people still there.

  2. Jill

    Yeah, I bet it would be weird – but interesting and no doubt educational in many ways. As I said, I really like the idea of doing it for a period of time.

  3. Lesley

    Wow. Wish it was me. I’m going to be living this one vicariously.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]