Academic couples with small children who are interested in the same conferences get to choose between skipping the conference altogether and bringing the kids. Oh, when they’re older we’ll leave them with family (we hope!) but 18 months is young to spend a week away from your parents. So Scott and I are experiencing ISEA in Istanbul with children, which is a slightly different experience than ISEA in Helsinki and Tallinn without the kids. The art/eco-debate in the hamam tonight was out for instance, wonderful as it sounds. I doubt that an 18 month old and a 3-year-old would have given quite the right vibe to the debates. However, there is room for other experiences. While Scott was in a panel on electronic literature today, for instance, I met Sarah Drury on the Istiklal tram, and was able to hear about her work with augmented reality using mobile phones (while hanging on to Jessie who wanted to stand on the back platform, and as Benji threw his pacifier off the tram and then complained loudly about it). Sarah has a nearly four year old at home, she said.

Luckily, at ISEA the art exhibitions are key, and the exhibitions are great with kids. We’re staying around the corner from the main ISEA exhibition at Cumhuriyet Art Gallery by Taksim Square and were able to try out the strange sounds that Kilian Ochs’ spherical construction made. When you touch your hand to two pieces of metal on it at once, the sphere “sings”. Ochs climbs into the sphere and spins around the square making music in quite an eerie fashion.

The gallery itself is an amazing space; a series of white archways connecting a long chain of white-painted rooms. Jessie’s favourite work was Karen Casey’s “Meditation Wall“, billed as “an immersive environment designed to ellicit meditative or trance-like mind states”. Adult as I am, my first instinct was to sit on the benches and quietly look at the changing shapes on the wall, reminiscent of the many painted bowls I saw yesterday at the bazaar, but more calming. Jessie instantly saw a different aspect of the work: the haunting arabesque and the changing display on the wall could only mean a dance party. Clearly. And the effect of watching one’s own dancing shadow is, obviously, quite mesmerising. I don’t know how I could have missed that!

I forgot to check the name of this work, with its gently pulsating plastic bags. I couldn’t find it on the website, either – there were a lot more works in the exhibition than in the description so I must be missing something. Oh, Benjamin is responsible for the voice-over on this video. He was riding on my back by this point and I guess wanted some attention. He had probably dropped his pacifier…

Tina Gonzales’ “Chameleon” is a set of three large “books” with faces sleeping on each page – until a person walks past and looks at the faces. That wakes them up, and as we discovered (when somebody told us, actually) the faces respond to your expression. The ones we tried did best at recognising surprise and smiling, though one did pretty well with a frown as well. Here’s Benjamin trying to flirt with one of the books.

Other kid favourites included Mark Cypher’s sandpit in a suitcase, a white lady (artificial) who glided around at the command of a joystick (I can’t find her in the catalog though) and the plants that sang when you touched them. And the wonderful little robot that twisted and turned – and broke itself in two! Luckily its creator was right by to fix it. We were quite surprised when she explained it wasn’t part of the artwork.

Here’s another piece I can’t find in the catalog: “Attachment Theory”, where two cars are emotionally co-dependent.

"Attachment Theory"

Interestingly enough Jessie immediately identified them as people-like. “The red one is you, mummy, and the blue one is me!”. And co-dependent we certainly are, mother and three-year-old. And I know that soon she’ll grow up and these conference-with-kids days will be a distant memory.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “ISEA with kids

  1. S¯ren Pold

    Sounds great. Liked your panel, but found the exhibition as much of the conference somewhat unfocused… The best exhibition in Istanbul that I saw was the biennial and the fabulous Matter-Light at the Borusan M¸zik Evi gallery down Istlikal halfway to T¸nel. Did you see this?
    Anyway, Istanbul with kids sounds great. I guess I’ll do this soon!

  2. Jill Walker Rettberg

    Matter-Light? We completely missed that one. And unfortunately the biennal was closed when we went there (sigh), which was certainly a pity – I heard it was excellent.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.