The first plenary session at MiT5 was fabulous, like being in a mirrorworld where everyone gets it. Henry Jenkins‘ introduction used Stephen Colbert as an example of a mainstream media character who gets mashup and remix culture. To the audience’s enjoyment, he showed us the sequence Colbert did inviting people to edit him, pointing out that what makes us laugh is imagining how what Colbert says can be remixed and reedited. Colbert’s greenscreen challenge is another example of how Colbert gets participatory culture, but of course, ViaCom’s removal of their content (including clips of Colbert) from YouTube due to copyright issues shows how even within a single institution we have an enormous split between those who get and play with participatory culture and those who try to keep us within the paradigm of copyright.

Jenkins also mentioned the less positive sides of participatory culture, such as the racist ads portraying Barack Obama as Hillary’s chauffer, or as Borat. He recommended a book coming out later this year by Andrew Keen, called The Cult of the Amateur: How today’s Internet is killing our culture, which deals with the dangers of participatory culture. Jenkins said he doesn’t agree with everything Keen argues, but that it’s an important and thought-provoking book.

David Thorburn continued with some introductory remarks to the first panel, a plenary on Folk Culture and Digital Cultures. He noted that the current breakdown between high and low/folk culture in many ways brings us back to the lack of distance between high and low that existed in earlier times. Shakespeare was popular culture in Elizabethan times. “Text”, he said, “is a site of negotiation, as is becoming clear again with digital media and television.” The constant negotiation of what constituted a text was also characteristic to the founding texts of Western culture, such as the Homerian epics.

More later. For now, I’ll twitter a bit. Luca is conveniently twittering from the Second Life session, where I am not, and Jean Burgess is on twitter too.

[Nick Montfort wrote about the rest of this plenary over at GrandTextAuto, as has Axel Bruns.]

4 thoughts on “introduction to MiT5

  1. Fabio Giglietto

    @Mit5(2-105) Segnala il resoconto della prima sessione plenaria:

  2. FG

    The correct link to Jean Burgess twitter is 🙂

  3. Jill

    Oops, thanks!

  4. Grand Text Auto » Friday at MiT5

    […] Here are a few brief snippets from Media in Transition 5 today. My fellow panelist Jill Walker blogged about the introduction, so, on to the first session… […]

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Triple book talk: Watch James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me discuss our 2023 books

Thanks to everyone who came to the triple book talk of three recent books on machine vision by James Dobson, Jussi Parikka and me, and thanks for excellent questions. Several people have emailed to asked if we recorded it, and yes we did! Here you go! James and Jussi’s books […]

Image on a black background of a human hand holding a graphic showing the word AI with a blue circuit board pattern inside surrounded by blurred blue and yellow dots and a concentric circular blue design.
AI and algorithmic culture Machine Vision

Four visual registers for imaginaries of machine vision

I’m thrilled to announce another publication from our European Research Council (ERC)-funded research project on Machine Vision: Gabriele de Setaand Anya Shchetvina‘s paper analysing how Chinese AI companies visually present machine vision technologies. They find that the Chinese machine vision imaginary is global, blue and competitive.  De Seta, Gabriele, and Anya Shchetvina. “Imagining Machine […]

Do people flock to talks about ChatGPT because they are scared?

Whenever I give talks about ChatGPT and LLMs, whether to ninth graders, businesses or journalists, I meet people who are hungry for information, who really want to understand this new technology. I’ve interpreted this as interest and a need to understand – but yesterday, Eirik Solheim said that every time […]