The BBC interviewer had read my blog post and remarked, a smile in her voice, that it was a little daunting to think that I’d blog my disappointment if I found her questions inane. Was part of the appeal of blogging the power?

Once, after an interview with a journalist who had done no research on blogs at all and expected me to give him the questions as well as the answers as well as suggestions about interesting (i.e. young sexy self-revealing webcamming) bloggers to interview, and who then, after I’d explained blogs to him for an hour, wrote the article leaving out my name, well, after that I did write a grumpy post. I deleted it though. Not really much point in alienating journalists, is there, and anyway, I can vividly imagine a lone journalist with too little time and too many articles to write. We all cut corners sometimes. And I learnt something about not taking it too seriously and how to appreciate those journalists who are actually interested in the topic.

The BBC World Service had done their research, even to reading my blog post about their interview, and I expect it’ll be an interesting program. They’re also going to be talking to Stuart Hughes, a BBC war reporter, and to an Iranian blogger I didn’t catch the name of, which gives an interesting spread. It’ll be broadcast next week sometime, in a program called The Word.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “interviewed

  1. Hasanagha

    For Iranian bloggers it’s not a diary nor a toy. It’s the only way to express oneselves. It’s a way of breathing in a completely sensured society. Remember that iranian bloggers make the largest number of bloggers on the net.

  2. Jill

    Are they really the largest number on the net? I do know that blogs are very important in Iran, but I’ve not read enough about it yet. I’m looking forward to hearing the interview with the Iranian on the BBC World Service.

  3. noah

    Will there be a transcript or audio archive available online?

  4. Jill

    It looks as though the last program is online? At least the homepage for The Word has something on it. The presenter said she thought the blog interviews will be broadcast next Thursday though she wasn’t quite sure.

  5. Hasanagha

    Yes it is the lagest number, and it will be growing in the near future. The number of internet users in Iran has grown with 30% last year and it will grow more than 40% this year.
    The number of weblogs in Desember 2003 was more than 100.000 and every 5 minute a new Persian blog is born.

    Other interesting statistics:
    Number of internet users in Iran
    1994(250), 2003(3.500.000), 2004(5.000.000),
    2005(15.000.000)

  6. fivecats

    On a separate sub-topic, I think it’s great that someone is aware that they may be held publicly accountable for what they do in their professional life.

    Looking forward to hearing the story online. You will post a link, right?

  7. Jill

    That’s wonderful that there are so many bloggers in Iran. According to this recent artictle summarising various surveys of blogs and bloggers there are somewhere between 2.5 and 8 million blogs in the US alone. 2% of surveyed Americans in one study had their own blog – that’s about the same percentage as how many Iranians with net access have their own blogs, using your numbers – 100000 blogs and 5 million Iranians with net access.

    That is brilliant!

    Fivecats, of COURSE I’ll link to it and announce when it’s broadcast!

    🙂

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.