Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni Blogging book care ChatGPT conferences cultural bias data analysis electronic literature ELMCIP exhibition fascism Gephi history journalister LLMs machine vision media motherhood network analysis neural networks norsk open access presentation publication publications R research science fiction self-representation selfies social media surrealists Surveillance talks teaching trip report twitter UiB visualisation workshop
Uncategorised

electronic literature at Holmsbu

Jill1 Comment

I had fun talking about electronic literature today. I even slipped in a few laps in the pool after my talk. It‘s a beautiful place.

Here’s a brief summary of the talk, which I intended to be an intro to electronic literature and net fiction that would inspire the audience to explore more on their own. I started by showing some of Anne Bang Steinsland’s I mellom tiden followed by a couple of minutes of Young-Hae Chang’s Dakota, which rose some laughs. I pointed out some similarities to other genres (concrete poetry, animation, music video etc) and then moved on to Rob Bevan and Tim Wright’s Online Caroline, which does completely different stuff. I briefly explained the idea of Magic-tree.com, to show yet another way of doing things, followed by a brief introduction to David Still. Then I stepped back to talk a bit about Vannevar Bush, Ted Nelson and Doug Engelbart, continuing with a little bit of Michael Joyce’s afternoon, a story, mentioning how the hypertextual form mirrors the protagonist’s inability to reach a centre. I showed the section on loss at The Uninvited, noting that it also uses the medium in sync with the content. Finally I talked about how readers write, using examples like Metafilter, The Fray, Other People’s Stories and Dikt.no. Some of these are edited, some not, and of course they have different purposes. Weblogs are another place readers writer, and my quick run down of blogs included the Norwegian portal to web diaries, Nettdagbok.no, Nyrup.dk, Oblivio.com, Belle de Jour and I slipped in a story about She’s a Flight Risk that I didn’t have slides for.

If you’re looking for more electronic literature, The Electronic Literature Organisation’s Directory is a good place to start. Rhizome.org, among other sites, has links to net.art. And you can always keep reading this blog 🙂

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. Peter Cooke

    Hello Jill

    Listened in to the World Radio programme last night. Decided to look in this morning. Fascinating!. Mentioned it to my wife when she woke up. Intend also to introduce Jill/txt to my youngest son Paul. I’m sure he will be interested. He works for SkyTV. Degree in Networking (Hallam)and is currently learning to design Web Sites at home.

    Hope to keep in touch

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.