I love my RSS feed. Every article I read on my almost too-brief commute from work (a mere 13 minutes by train) was brilliant. Culture Digitally and The Institute of Network Cultures both wrote about the leaked Operation Manual for Live Content Moderators on Facebook, that is, the exactly guidelines for moderators confirming, unconfirming or escalating reports of abuse on Facebook. The level of detail is disturbing, but honestly I am happy that Facebook has clear guidelines on most of this stuff. There are a few political things under “international compliance” that are worrying – censor any map of Kurdistan or burning of the Turkish flag? The analyses are interesting reads, though.

The next post I read was by Anne Helmond, who used a downloadable tool by Christopher Warnow to visualize the Amazon recommendation network around Software Studies. Here’s her map – and you can see closeups on her blog.

You can download the tool and run it yourself on Mac, Linux and Windows, and the source is provided too. It’s not just pretty – it serves as a “what to read next” guide, as Anne notes, but Christopher  Warnow also points out that he found interesting differences between the German and US versions of Amazon. For instance, the Germans tend to read Deleuze in a postmodernist context, whereas the Americans are more likely to read him alongside French situationists.

 


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]