Search Here ….

Tags

affect AI AI slop AI STORIES alumni art autocorrect Blogging book ChatGPT conferences data analysis digital art electronic literature ELMCIP environmental art exhibition flies Gephi history journalister LLMs London machine vision market literature motherhood network analysis norsk open access Pierre Huyghe publication publications research science fiction self-representation selfies social media Surveillance talks teaching tracking trip report twitter UiB visualisation
social media

Hiking with Howard Rheingold

Jill1 Comment

Back home again, I’m still processing all the ideas and people we met with in Chicago and California. Our last visit in California was to Howard Rheingold, who took us walking in the mountains by his home outside of San Francisco. Rheingold has a beautiful enclosed garden smelling of roses, with an office for his writing and a studio down the back for his painting. A work in progress in his studio is a pataphysical slot machine he’s building with some friends – all wood and paint now, but to have three dimensional dioramas and circuit boards as well when it’s finished. I should have taken a photo – but I did find a video of it on YouTube (of course). It’s painted blue now, but is still a ways from being completed.

When Rheingold visited Bergen in 2004 for our Digital og sosial conference I remember he found himself a rock on Fløyen to bring home to his garden. I was quite impressed that eight years he knew exactly where it was, neatly arranged with other rocks and souvenirs of his travels. Rheingold lives in the hills near Muir Woods, home of the redwoods, and he took us walking up the steep hills at an impressive speed – we Bergeners are used to hills but were still huffing and puffing behind him.

2012-04-27 17.10.52

Howard Rheingold has been one of those people who sees what’s going to happen next since the early days of social technologies. His 1993 book The Virtual Community (now available online) was seminal, as was Smart Mobs ten years later. I’m currently reading his latest book, Net Smart, which outlines five literacies needed to manage technology usefully – when to allow yourself to be distracted while surfing for example, and when (and how) to maintain a focus. One of his major current interests is mind amplifiers – that is, the ways in which technology ranging from writing to blogging to more can augment our thinking.

A view from the hills outside San Francisco

Admiring the view

Unfortunately the videos from the Digital og sosial conference in Bergen in 2004 are lost in cyberspace (we’re looking for them and may yet get them up again) but Jon did find and upload this video of Howard Rheingold answering questions after his talk at the conference. I’ll let you know if we find the video of the talk itself…

Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. Bryan Alexander

    Isn’t Mt. Tam an amazing walk, especially with such a guide?

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI and algorithmic culture University politics

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.