Hey, I’m on the jury of Gullbloggen, Dagbladet’s blog competition. You can nominate Norwegian blogs (written in Norwegian or English) until November 2, and then the jury – Bente Kalsnes, Olav Anders and me, will select three in each category, leaving the final selection to the readers’ vote. The list of nominated blogs so far is an interesting list of Norwegian blogs – there sure are a lot of them these days…
Previous Post
gathering information 3 thoughts on “gullbloggen”
Leave A Comment Cancel reply
Recommended Posts
Having your own words processed and restated can help you improve your thinking and your writing. That’s one reason why talking with someone about your ideas can help you clarify your thoughts. ChatGPT is certainly no replacement for a knowledgable friend or colleague, […]
Like the rest of the internet, I’ve been playing with ChatGPT, the new AI chatbot released by OpenAI, and I’ve been fascinated by how much it does well and how it still gets a lot wrong. ChatGPT is a foundation model, that […]
A few weeks ago Meta released Galactica, a language model that generates scientific papers based on a prompt you type in. They put it online and invited people to try it out, but had to remove it after just three days after […]
This spring when I was learning R, I came across a paper by Anders Kristian Munk, Asger Gehrt Olesen and Mathieu Jacomy about using machine learning in anthropology – not to classify big data, as machine learning is often used, but to […]
I’m co-organising a preconfernece workshop for AoIR2022 in Dublin today with Annette Markham and MaryElizabeth Luka today, and I’m going to show a few of the ways I’ve engaged with new digital platforms and genres over the years. This is a key […]
I’m (virtually) attending Elisa Serifinalli’s conference Drones in Society: New Visual Aesthetics today, and will be presenting work-in-progress exploring how drones are presented in the 500 novels, movies, artworks, games and other stories that we have analysed in the Database of Machine […]
J.V.
How do you evaluate the different ones? What’s important? (layout, updating rate, quality of the material and so on)
Jill
We have a list, yes, which we’re adjusting as we go through the blogs. Quality of writing, consistent style, gooddesign, originality, , community (e.g. links to other blogs, has active discussions), good work with sources (links to background or supporting material), humour, etc.
There are over 200 blogs on the list, and lots of them are very different from each other – it’s hard to or imposible to name absolute criteria for “a good blog”. And there are obviously a lot more good blogs than the three in each category we’ll be nominating.
orson
Hi! I just want to say that I’ve put a link to your page on my blog. I hope that it doesn’t bother you.