Today Google released a new search tool that will search your personal files: emails, documents, chat transcripts and so on. The next version of windows, codenamed Longhorn and planned for 2006, was going to be based on a powerful new search-centric file system, but gave up on it – looks like Google is happy to fill the spot. The software’s only available for Windows right now. And, obviously aware of privacy concerns about gmail, Google promises that none of the data on your computer will ever get to Google central. Update: John Battelle has an extensive piece about this, including an interview with a Google representative. A cool thing is that the desktop search will also search every website that you’ve ever looked at, using your browser’s logs and cache. It only works on Microsoft’s Internet Explorer for now. Hm.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “google searches your harddrive”

  1. Ian Bogost

    Mac users, rejoice: http://quicksilver.blacktree.com. Changed the way I use my computer.

  2. Jill

    I installed that a few weeks ago and have been trying to use it but obviously haven’t quite cracked the codes – or else my brain works differently or something. So far it doesn’t seem a lot easier than the standard interface.

    What, specifically, do you like about it, Ian?

  3. bicyclemark

    Eww.. hooray for google invading the little privacey I value.

  4. trond

    “Eww.. hooray for google invading the little privacey I value.”
    Then don’t use it. It’s not mandatory to download and use every piece of software in the world 😉

  5. :)

    Hi. Apple wil have this in ther next versjon that wil come next year 🙂 http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/spotlight.html

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]