I’ve been using a Fitbit step counter since New Year and have been enjoying the various visualizations it gives me of my days. It provides an interesting form of automated diary of my days.

Here, for instance, is last Monday, Easter Monday, which was a holiday here in Norway. The y-axis shows calories burnt each five minutes, and the x-axis shows the time of day. That pink spike at 7:30 am is me walking over to my mother’s to have breakfast with my sister and her family before they began their eight hour drive home after Easter in Bergen. After that you can see I barely sat down until our two and nearly-four-year-old were in bed at 7 pm, although we didn’t do anything particularly strenuous. Then a nice relaxing evening with Scott, with a bit of pottering around the house and some getting ready for bed in the evening. I logged a total of 11417 steps.

On Tuesday I was back to work, and as you can see, we got off to a late start – I was in bed until nearly 8. The yellow lines are walking the kids’ to preschool, then I took the train to work, so there’s only a narrow pink spark where I walked up the hill to the university from town. I was rather sedentary at work, although I did use my standing desk a little in the afternoon. The second pink line is me running to the train, then I picked up the kids, we got dinner going and so on. Once they were in bed at 7, I crashed, then did some housework (the blue lines after 8 pm) and then sat down to do some more work before turning in. A sadly sedentary day, at only 8698 steps.

On Wednesday I was determined to be a bit more pro-active, and after an efficient morning and preschool-dropoff I walked to work, which takes about 50 minutes and is a pretty good workout, I’ve realized. It costs a lot less time than going to the gym and I’m more likely to actually do it, especially now I’ve got the Fitbit cheering me on. I moved around a bit more at work and was more active throughout the afternoon and at home in the evening too, ending up at 15505 steps.

Fitbit lets you download (some of) your data, and I’d love to see other examples of how you could visualize it – and of course there are other views provided by Fitbit in addition to this. There are other fitness trackers too, such as Nike’s Fuelband, which is a bracelet that actually vibrates to alert you that you’ve been too sedentary.

They’re not primarily sold as diaries, though, and although you can add journal notes for each day, they’re not displayed next to the visualizations so that it’s not too easy to annotate days, either, without taking them out of the Fitbit website as I’ve done here.

 


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]