Don’t you hate it when you can’t track down a citation? Amazon’s full text search of books shows that William Gibson’s Neuromancer certainly doesn’t contain the words “the street finds its own use for things” or any sentence, in fact, with the words street, use or uses and things in it. The line is all over the web, though, always attributed to Gibson, and usually to Neuromancer. Where it is not. And me, well, I like the line, which makes me think of Neuromancer, and I want to use it!


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “faulty attributions?”

  1. derik

    Could be that Amazon’s search is less than reliable. I can’t believe Gibson didn’t use the word “street” at all in that book.

  2. Jill

    Oh, he used street a lot, just not close to “use” and “things”, that’s all 🙂

  3. Tama

    The quote is actually from an article Gibson wrote called “Academy Leader” in the collection Cyberspace: First Steps. Transcript here.

  4. Martin GL

    That’s from his second novel, too. Count Zero. I think it’s the scene where Turner is out in the desert, talking to the Asian doctor from the medical lab.

  5. Tama

    Martin GL is quite right: “The street tries to find its own uses for things, Mr. Turner.” (p. 69 of the Amazon link above). Since Count Zero came out first (1987), Gibson must have been quoting himself in the “Academy Leader” article. Of course, either would do nicely for a reference. 🙂

  6. Jill

    You guys are awesome! Thank you so much!!!

  7. Jose Angel

    There’s a nice connection between that sentence and Stephen Jay Gould’s notion of “exaptation” as an evolutionary principle (e.g. wings became an instrument for flight not by design but because of a collateral use). Although perhaps the connection is an instance of exaptation, too.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of blogpost from sept 11, 2001, about blogger.com showing blog posts about the attacks
Networked Politics social media

25 years since September 11

I’ve been reading through my blog posts on September 11, 2001 and the days that followed. The things that stand out to me – in addition to the horror of the attack itself – are how massively we (or at least I) used the web to understand what was happening, […]

AI STORIES

AI-generated stories have longer endings than human stories

My colleague Jessica Witte has just shared a preprint where she compared the emotional arcs of the stories we generated using gpt-4o-mini to those of human-authored (pre-2022) stories from the subreddit r/WritingPrompts, conveniently gathered in this dataset. She found a distinct difference in the endings of the LLM-generated stories: both […]

How to peer review a paper in 2026

Dorothy Bishop, a psychologist, wrote a useful list of what reviewers need to look out now that so many papers are bad science that looks good thanks to LLMs. Read her whole blog post, she explains it well, but here’s a brief version because I’m pretty sure we’ll be needing […]

“So what if it was ChatGPT? It *could* have been true!”

I recently read a good article on the different kinds of truth a language model operates with by Luke Mann, Liam Magee and Vanicka Arora, Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models, but despite its lovely typology of truths (consensus, correspondence, coherence and pragmatic) it doesn’t help me with […]

AI STORIES

AI shimmer and sparkle

I have this hunch that sparkles and glow and shimmer are somehow a point in the latent spaces of LLMs that have more connections than you would expect. Perhaps their connotation to magic and to the unknown matches some of the mystique of genAI? Or perhaps these words are used […]