On Thursday Mum sent me an SMS from Rottnest, where she’s holidaying with my sister and her family. “Hi jill you are mentioned in todays Australian (Media Supplement, p. 7 on warblogs love mum” Auntie Joan saw it too, flying home from Tasmania, and Mum says Auntie Joan says I’m famous – I love my family 🙂 So anyway, having been kind of distracted the last few days I only just went hunting for the mention, and hey presto, here it is:

Weblogs do more than talk. They help to mobilise protest action. But Jill Walker, a blogger in Norway, has asked an intriguing question. She received her first SMS call to protest: an anti-war boycott of US products. “I read lots of American blogs and use lots of American web services,” she said in a post to her blog. “When people talk about boycott, do they generally include information and communication?” After all, the weblog as a genre itself was indigenous to the US. (The Australian 10/4/03, “Warblogs: Weapons of Mass Destruction“)

I like the thought of my brother-in-law, who sent me the SMS, sitting on a sunny porch outside a Rottnest bungalow reading a thrice-mediated response to that very SMS.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “fame

  1. Robert

    I guess you missed my comment of a few days ago, then. I posted a link to the article.

    I love Rottnest, though I haven’t been back for a couple of years. Actually, it was about this time two years ago. My family and a few others stayed in Kingston Barracks for the weekend, and had a lot of fun (even if it was way too cold for swimming). Have you ever been? What’s your connection to Perth?

  2. Jill

    Oh! Thanks, Robert! And sorry for missing your comment – I usually do read the comments but, um, I’ve been kind of wonky the last week…

    My Perth connection is that mum and dad are from Perth. They studied in Britain, wanted a year in another culture, learnt Swedish (on account of its being 1968 and social democracy and all being big) and moved to Oslo for a few years. (No, Oslo’s not in Sweden. They must have gotten distracted on the way over or something.) In Oslo I and my sister were born, then we all moved back to Perth for good. For good actually only lasted four years or so, at which point mum and dad decided to come to Bergen for a few months and ended up staying, merely returning to Perth to pack up the furniture, find an agent to rent the house for the next twenty years and give notice to their employers.

    And yes, I’ve been to Rottnest several times – I got to go to school there for a few weeks as a kid, which was brilliant. I learnt to ride a bike on Rottnest! And my daughter ate her first mouthfuls of clean, beach sand there when she was half a year old 🙂 About time to go back, I reckon!

    Apparently I look exactly the same now as I did when we moved here when I was seven. Comforting thought, huh?

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.