I’ve been exploring Facebook recently, after Ina invited me to join, and it really does have some intriguing aspects – it seems to merge many things from many other social sites. Of course I’m the ONLY “faculty member” on it from my university, but what do you expect. Today I noticed this sorting of “stories”, which I found oddly fascinating. It makes me want to click and read about this person’s “network stories” and “relationship stories” – the first includes such dull statements as “X joined the Uni. Bergen network”, the second, well, most of my friends seem not to have “relationship stories” in Facebook, but I have a single relationship story: “Jill is listed as engaged.” It would be much more interesting reading the relationship stories of somone a little more flighty. “Status stories” are pretty dull, I have to say. “Jill is at work.” “Jill is at home.” “Jill is at work.”

While each of these events is not really a narrative in itself, their presentation in consecutive order, with dates, certainly sets up an implied causality or at least sequence – if “The king died, then the queen died of grief” is a minimal narrative (events, sequence, causality), then Facebook stories put together certainly might be. Although they require a different sort of interpretation than a conventional narrative does.

I assume somebody’s written a Facebook fiction, yeah? Or is there hardly any point in fictionalising something already this intriguing?


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 thoughts on “facebook narrative

  1. Glyn

    Jill,

    the sad state of people’s situation comments in Facebook, only serves to reflect the sad state of the writers sense of humour.

  2. Jill

    By “the writer” I take it you mean Facebook itself?

  3. Michael Faris

    It certainly has been interesting following some of my friends’ relationships on Facebook, and how they often break up, get back together, break up again, etc. What’s really interesting is that EVERYONE knows what is going on in their relationship (or at least, a version of it) before they even tell anyone. It does make for an interesting story.

    People’s status messages can also make interesting stories since a lot of Facebook users focus on irony and other forms of humor to tell inside jokes, poke fun at others, etc.

    I’ll add you as a friend.

  4. KF

    My students often use the situation comments quite nicely. From my current news feed:

    Student 1 “is in need of a new profile pic… but what?”
    Student 2 “is not harboring a fugitive.”
    Student 3 “is still sick. Grrr.”
    Student 4 “is mostly cloudy.”
    Student 5 “is harnessing the awesome power of the universe to drive his new Mac Pro.”

  5. Jill

    Oh, situation comments are the status message things? Where you say you’re at work or at home and you can type in your own message instead? Aha.

  6. Francois Lachance

    Dear Dr. Jill and dear jill/txt, it appears that Facebook favours the copula (the verb to be) as a narrative trigger or even as a narration encapusultor. X needs, X negates claim of harbouring, X coping with sickness, X clouds, X harnesses … As the examples that Kathleen F. provided indicate the transitive is missing. Like so many monads… the literature about MUDs and MOOs from their text-based days mihgt be interesting for comparison purposes. I recall having lots of fun with the distinction between “emote” and “say” commands (led to inadvertant imperatives when a user intended to emote but used say).

  7. Kyle

    Jill-> as somebody who is perpetually knee-deep in the blog world, what do you think are effective and reasonable means to publicizing a fiction blog? I became seriously involved in writing mine a few months ago and want to know how to “get it out there”…
    Perhaps you’ve already written a blog on the subject?
    Thanks!
    -ckp003@latech.edu
    (thelordcaldwell.blogspot.com)

  8. Jill

    FranÁois, that’s a great idea for comparison – and you’re right, the grammatical structures provided by the system (MOO, MUD, IM, iChat, Facebook) certainly steer the kinds of story-telling and/or self-representation people can do. Nice.

    Kyle, I really don’t know, I’ve never tried to promote a fiction blog. I just read em 🙂

  9. linda

    i confess that i enjoy the status comments, even the mundane ones … there’s a couple of interesting things i’ve stumbled across on facebook. in particular, mez was writing some experiments involving twittering and her status became an aphoristic theoretical moments. linda

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.