I’ve been deliberately pretending not to notice the national elections (the somewhat conservative Norwegian paper Aftenposten has an English edition if you’re curious), because, well, I can’t vote though I’ve lived here for 25 years, no, I can’t vote unless I give up that possibility of maybe moving back to Australia one day. And if you’ve ever been in a situation where you have to choose between citizenships you know how hard that choice is. Especially knowing that more than half the countries in the world — including Australia, heck, including Sweden, Norway’s neighbour — are fine with dual citizenship, and, oh, also that there are tens of thousands of dual citizens in Norway anyway because a Norwegian citizen can be granted, say, Australian citizenship without any quibbles and keep both.

Not being a citizen of the country where I live is fine except on election day. And this year, amazingly the labour party and the socialist left are cooperating! Can you imagine!? So the traditional left majority in parliament might actually translate to a left wing government, instead of failed cooperation and a right/centre minority coalition!

Not that it’ll necessarily make much difference — which seems to be what people on buses explaining to their neighbours say is why they won’t vote.

But still: as Martin says: if you can, VOTE! Please. If nothing else just because I can’t. You have a few more hours left.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “election day

  1. Simon

    Yep. Not having a vote sucks. But at least I get to gripe that there is no government on the face of the earth that represents me (I lost the vote in the UK, too, having not voted in the last election before leaving the country).

    I agree about the citizenship thing, too. If I could have both, there’s be no problem; but having to give up my country of birth? I think I’m not as rational as I would like to think I am.

  2. Martin

    Here’s crossing our fingers. It’s going to be a long night.

    I can’t vote either. I’m a Danish citizen, but I can’t even vote in Denmark. I think I’m going to be changing my citizenship for the next election. I watched my girlfriend voting today, and it still feels like not being invited to the birthday party.

  3. Martin

    Silly me! I said that already in my post. I forgot. Heh.

  4. Jill

    Not represented by any government, yeah, that’s me too – there are quite a lot of us, really, aren’t there… And no, of course I can’t vote in Australia. I could if I moved back and lived there for two consecutive months before an election, I think. I did, once, when I was 18. It was great. In Australia, did you know, they have this neat system called preferential voting, I think, where you can vote for lots of parties. So, for instance: well, my first priority would be the greens, you know. If they don’t get the majority, I’d like my vote to go to the marihuana party (yes there was one). Oh they didn’t get the majority? OK, then, Labour. Perhaps this was just the Perth deal, I can’t even remember if it was a national election I voted in or just state elections.

    Ah well. At least I can vote in my local elections. That’s better than nothing.

    Not being invited to the birthday party indeed 🙂

  5. Martin

    The scoop: Bondevik is out, Stoltenberg is in. The government is strong labour, and weak
    socialist left – much weaker than expected. The “Progress”-party had their best election ever, due mainly to the fact that the right wing and the christian democrats had a lousy election. Carl I Hagen couldn’t stop smiling all night long. Not a perfect victory, but at least we’re in
    business. We’ll see what happens tomorrow morning.

  6. Liz

    I didn’t realize you couldn’t keep your citizenship while moving to Norway. That is really discriminating as one can live overseas for a long time and still vote in the elections. I know at least in Victoria (Oz) there is really only three parties to vote for. But I think Australias system which makes it an offense not to vote is interesting.
    It sucks not being able to vote in the country where you spend most of your time. There are organisations that wants everyone to have one passport, so-called transnational organisations. Not sure if that will work though.

    Anyways, terrific with a change in government!

  7. Jill

    You can keep your own citizenship and move to Norway (if you get a visa), but if you after seven years want to become a Norwegian citizen, you have to give up your original citizenship. Whether or not you can vote in your home country depends on the rules of your home country. They recently changed the rules in Australia so you can vote for longer, living overseas, but I’m not eligible. Something to do with having lived abroad for more than three years before they changed the rules. The Southern Cross Group has excellent information for ex-pay Australians.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Don’t do a systematic review if you’re in the humanities

This paper is a great example of why you probably shouldn’t use a systematic literature review for a theoretical and conceptual research question like “How does artificial intelligence affect the perception of authenticity and aura in art?” However, if you’re looking for an annotated list of 48 recent articles about […]

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]