Now that his thesis is done (like mine!) Anders has resurfaced with a delightful desciption of the arcane doctoral defence rituals of Norway. I think there may be tiny differences between the Bergen and Oslo versions of said ritual. In Bergen the candidate summarises his or her thesis at the beginning of the defence (or disputas as we call it – of course only Latin is used for such names) whereas Anders writes that this is the task of the first opponent in Oslo.

I would also like to add that once I witnessed a candidate who was permitted to sit during the disputas. She was 7 months pregnant, though, and the chair was wobbly and high so she was almost standing anyway. It did make me wonder whether non-pregnant but nervous candidates might get away with a chair.

Probably my adrenalin levels will be so high that sitting down will be the last thing on my mind.


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.