Albertine Aaberge teaches high school students digital media, and noted in a blog post yesterday that she’s had much the same experience with them as I described in my presentation in Oslo last Thursday: teens have a fair bit of experience with digital and social media, but they tend not to make the connection between that and their learning environments. They may have a form of “digital literacy” but it’s not the kind that is expected by teachers, universities, or, I would argue, their future employees.

Thinking of this made me think of my eleven-year-old daughter’s homework yesterday. She’s in sixth grade and had finished the chapter on geometry in her maths book, so her maths homework was to spend fifteen minutes working online on maths using links her teacher had provided in her school’s LMS. Forty minutes later she called out “Look at this, Mum!” She’d been playing with a symmetry game at Mathemania.no and was thrilled at the groovy patterns she could make.

Now this symmetry game is actually very close to the Flash-based games she loves to play anyway. She enjoys drawing games, and solving “missions” and decorating her igloo in Club Penguin, and various rather insipid decorating your bedroom sort of games at Games2Girls. She’s bookmarked sites like ninja kiwi, Miniclip and Scribble, a game where you draw lines to help your “blots” get through hindrances. She’d now far rather play Flash games of a Saturday morning than watch cartoons on TV, which used to be the thing to do on weekends when mothers don’t want to get up early. Going to her computer now to check out her bookmarks, I see her browser is open to “storytime” at the BBC, which is also a link provided by her teacher in the LMS.

A site like Mathemania.no gives kids maths in a medium they already know – fun little Flash games that you can play with and explore as you play with plasticine or drawing equipment or lego blocks or dolls. So kids can use the digital literacy they have – basic browser and gaming skills – to learn maths.

A site like Mathemania transfers maths skills into the kids’ area of digital literacy or competancy. That’s great.

But we also need to be helping kids to learn to transfer their species of digital literacy into the kinds of demands the adult world will require. We can’t just translate all knowledge into Flash games and the Wikipedia and Facebook and expect young people to intuitively “get” how to, for instance, conduct productive web searches, evaluate information critically, present it to others using appropriate digital means – or even, for 95% of them, to learn to PROGRAM those Flash games or make those critical remixes of popular culture that we’re so thrilled to see when we discover them.

I really think that schools and educators are increasingly aware of these issues – and I think that we need to keep that focus.

I might have to try to find Aurora a summer camp or something that teaches her how to make Flash games 🙂


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “digital literacy and sixth-graders

  1. S¯ren Pold

    Hi Jill,

    Do you know Mitch Resnick (MIT-prof. that worked on Lego’s Mindstorm and other things…) http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/?
    His group made Scratch http://scratch.mit.edu/ which is a fun programming environment for kids. There are several languages available, e.g. Swedish I think, dunno about Norwegian – perhaps not so important for you 😉
    I’ve been trying to get somebody to translate it into Danish…

    And good luck with bringing up kids now and in the future 🙂

  2. Serial Mapper

    Initiation aux maths et vision…

    La fille de Jill/txt (blogueuse ÈmÈrite) a trouvÈ ce site web pour apprendre les maths   C’est en norvÈgien (?) mais comme le site est essentiellement visuel on peut mÍme quand s’en faire une idÈe. Cliquez sur les icÙnes et vous verrez des chos…

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.