Last year, at ELO2013 in Paris, I presented a network analysis of creative works of electronic literature cited by PhD dissertations in the field. I’m revising the paper for publication in the Electronic Book Review next month, and I’ve added lots more dissertations to the data. Spreadsheets and Gephi are starting to drive me mad, but I’m getting there!

Here’s a list of the 44 dissertations in my data sample. In total they cite 467 different creative works of electronic literature. Sorry there are no links, but you can find entries for all these in the ELMCIP Knowledge Base, and each entry includes links to entries for the works they cite. Many of the dissertations also have full text available.

Michael Mateas Interactive Drama, Art, and Artificial Intelligence 2002
Anders Fagerjord Rhetorical Convergence: Earlier Media Influence on Web Media Form 2003
Carolyn Guertin Quantum Feminist Mnemotechnics: The Archival Text, Digital Narrative and The Limits of Memory 2003
Jill Walker Fiction and Interaction: How Clicking a Mouse Can Make You Part of a Fictional World 2003
Scott Rettberg Destination Unknown: Experiments in the Network Novel 2003
Anna Gunder Hyperworks: On Digital Literature and Computer Games 2004
Donna Leishman Creating Screen-Based Multiple State Environments: Investigating Systems of Confutation 2004
Edward Maloney Footnotes in Fiction: A Rhetorical Approach 2005
Cheryl E. Ball A New Media Reading Strategy 2005
David Ciccoricco Repetition and Recombination: Reading Network Fiction 2005
Roman Zenner Hypertextual Fiction on the Internet: A Structural and Narratological Analysis 2005
Serge Bouchardon Le récit littéraire interactif. Narrativité et interactivité 2005
Anne Mangen New narrative pleasures? A cognitive-phenomenological study of the experience of reading digital narrative fictions 2006
Noah Wardrip-Fruin Expressive Processing: On Process-Intensive Literature and Digital Media 2006
D. Fox Harrell Theory and technology for computational narrative: an approach to generative and interactive narrative with bases in algebraic semiotics and cognitive linguistics 2007
Jeremy Douglass Command Lines: Aesthetics and Technique in Interactive Fiction and New Media 2007
Jessica Pressman Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media 2007
Maria Engberg Born Digital: Writing Poetry in the Age of New Media 2007
Nick Montfort Generating Narrative Variation in Interactive Fiction 2007
Cheri Crenshaw Exploiting Kairos in Electronic Literature: A Rhetorical Analysis 2008
Hans Kristian Rustad Tekstspill i hypertekst. Koherensopplevelse og sjangergjenkjennelse i lesing av multimodale hyperfiksjoner 2008
Andrew Hutchison Techno-historical Limits of the Interface: The Performance of Interactive Narrative Experiences 2009
Daniel C. Howe Creativity Support for Computational Literature 2009
Florian Hartling Der digitale Autor. Autorschaft im Zeitalter des Internets 2009
Markku Eskelinen Travels in Cybertextuality. The Challenge of Ergodic Literature and Ludology to Literary Theory 2009
Zuzana Husárová Písanie v interaktívnych médiách. Digitálna fikcia /Writing in the Interactive Media. Digital Fiction 2009
Leonardo L. Flores Typing the Dancing Signifier: Jim Andrews’ (Vis)Poetics 2010
Van Leavenworth The Gothic in Contemporary Interactive Fictions 2010
Anders Sundnes Løvlie Textopia: Experiments with Locative Literature 2011
David Jhave Johnston Aesthetic Animism: Digital Poetry as Ontological Probe 2011
Fabio De Vivo eLiterature, analisi critica, strumenti interpretativi, potenzialità e possibilità applicative 2011
Giovanna Di Rosario Electronic Poetry: Understanding Poetry in the Digital Environment 2011
Jukka Tyrkkö Fuzzy Coherence: Making Sense of Continuity in Hypertext Narratives 2011
Luciana Gattass Digital Literature: Theoretical and Aesthetic Reflections 2011
Maya Zalbidea Paniagua Reading and Teaching Gender Issues in Electronic Literature and New Media Art 2011
Rulon Matley Wood Hypertext and Ethnographic Representation: A Case Study 2011
Talan Memmott Digital Rhetoric and Poetics: Signifying Strategies in Electronic Literature 2011
Holly Dupej Next Generation Literary Machines: The “Dynamic Network Aesthetic” of Contemporary Poetry Generators 2012
Jeneen Naji Poetic Machines: an investigation into the impact of the characteristics of the digital apparatus on poetic expression 2012
Jennifer Roudabush Theorizing Digital Narrative: Beginnings, Endings, and Authorship 2012
Ugo Panzani “I think, therefore I connect”. Database, connessionismo ed esopoiesi nel romanzo anglo-americano (1995-2011) 2012
Anaïs Guilet Pour une littérature cyborg : l’hybridation médiatique du texte littéraire 2013
Fernanda Bonacho A Leitura em Ambiente Digital: Transliteracias da Comunicação 2013
Mette-Marie Zacher Sørensen Digital Poesi. Æstetisk Analyse og det Mediales Rolle i Kunstværkers Kommunikation 2013

This is all the dissertations on electronic literature between 2002 and 2013 that I’ve been able to find minus the following 12, which I couldn’t include because I either couldn’t access the full text, couldn’t read them (I could sort of read the German in Lang’s dissertation on Chinese electronic literature, but I couldn’t find anyone who could help me with the Chinese, and all the creative works referenced are in Chinese) or there were no links to creative works of electronic literature.

Belinda Barnet Lost in the Archive: Vision, Artefact and Loss in the Evolution of Hypertext 2004
Christy Dena Transmedia Practice: Theorising the Practice of Expressing a Fictional World across Distinct Media and Environments 2009
Clara Mancini Towards Cinematic Hypertext : A theoretical and Empirical Investigation 2003
Gavin Stewart A homecoming festival : the application of the dialogic concepts of addressivity and the awareness of participation to an aesthetic of computer-mediated textual art 2006
Lisbeth Klastrup Towards a Poetics of Virtual Worlds. Multiuser Textuality and the Emergence of Story 2003
Lori Emerson The Rematerialization of Poetry: From the Bookbound to the Digital 2008
Mark C. Marino I, Chatbot: The Gender and Race Performativity of Conversational Agents 2006
Mirona Magearu Digital poetry: Comparative textual performances in trans-medial spaces 2011
Wilton Azevedo Interpoesia: Le Debut de L’ecriture en Expansion 2009
Wilton Azevedo Interpoesia: o Inicio da Escritura Expandida 2009
Xiaomeng Lang Der Dialog der Kultur und die Kultur des Dialogs: Die chinesische Netzliteratur 2008
Zoltàn Szüts Szellem a gépben. A hypertext 2007

It would be interesting to do even more with the data. I really regret having shaved the data too much when I imported it into Gephi – I should have kept more of the metadata, but at the time I thought of it as a mess that would just complicate the affair. Now, though, I don’t have publication years or the university the PhD was granted by or the language it was written in, and so I can’t easily see how patterns of citation may have changed over time, or how geography, language or institutional links may affect citation practices. It’s pretty obvious that the French cite French works and the Portuguese Portuguese language works, but I have no idea whether the British cite different works from the Americans, for instance. The data’s all in the Knowledge Base. But I’d have to re-export it and there are way too many fiddly bits for me to do that right now. Maybe it’s good to have some questions still open for another time or another person to answer.

Here are all the creative works that are cited by at least two dissertations, along with links to the dissertations that cite them.

44-dissertations-2degree-works-and-dissertations


Discover more from Jill Walker Rettberg

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1 Comment

  1. the library

    Please give a word, if you want the library to try to find the english dissertations among the 12.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Screenshot of a paragraph from a New York Times article published May 12, 2026. Text reads: "The price of tomatoes -tart bursts of flavor in salads and sandwiches — surged nearly 40 percent in April from a year ago on a combination of bad weather, high tariffs and climbing transportation costs."
AI STORIES

Genre glitches and unexpected promotional phrases as a sign of AI writing

A genre glitch is a characteristic of LLM-assisted writing where the text suddenly switches genre, typically inserting a short promotional phrase full of sensory details into an informational text. Genre glitches occur when a word in the generated text is heavily associated with a genre or context that is markedly […]

Top of a ransom note from Shinyhunters hacking group. Text reads: "SHINYHUNTERS rooting your systems since '19 ;) ShinyHunters has breached Instructure (again). Instead of contacting us to resolve it they ignored us and did some "security patches"."
Networked Politics University politics

UiB self-hosts the open source version of Canvas, so wasn’t affected by the breach

On May 1st Canvas announced a security breach, and then yesterday the system was hacked. The login page was replaced by a ransom note: if universities don’t pay up by 12 May, student data will be released. Here’s what the login page looked like yesterday: Way back in 2015, when […]

AI and algorithmic culture Networked Politics

AI-generated images, fascist aesthetics: Dieselbrølet and Heimatstrom

My German is pretty dodgy, so when I first saw Heimatstrom on Bluesky, shared by Roland Meyer, a professor of visual culture at Universität Zürich’s Digital Society Initiative, I misinterpreted it and thought it was a far-right campaign. But no, Heimatstrom is a group of left-wing environmentalists using fascist AI […]

Photo of a billboard ad at Oslo S train station showing a smiliing conductor and the text "Du må ikke sove. Joda, bare sov du."
AI STORIES

“Du må ikke sove”: a floating motif detached from its meaning (or: LLMs can write Norwegian but miss cultural references)

There’s a new ad for the train between Stavanger and Oslo in Norway that uses a line from Arnulf Øverland’s famous anti-fascist poem Du må ikke sove (“You must not sleep”). Du må ikke sove, you must not sleep, the ad says. And then it flips it, jovially, joda, bare […]

Academics in Norway: Sign this petition asking for research-based discussions of how to use AI in universities

I just signed a petition calling for Norwegian universities to use research expertise on AI when deciding how to implement it, rather than having decisions be made mostly administratively. ,  If you are a researcher in Norway, please read it and sign it if you agree – and share with anyone else who might be interested. The petition was written by three researchers at UiT: Maria Danielsen (a philosopher who completed her PhD in 2025 on AI and ethics, including discussions of art and working life), Knut Ørke (Norwegian as a second language), and Holger Pötzsch (a professor of media studies with many years of research on digital media, video games, disruption, and working life, among other topics).  This is not about preventing researchers from exploring AI methods in their research. It is about not uncritically accepting the hype that everyone must use AI everywhere without critical reflection. It is about not introducing Copilot as the default option in word processors, or training PhD candidates to believe they will fall behind if they do not use AI when writing articles, without proper academic discussion. Changes like these should be knowledge-based and discussed academically, not merely decided administratively, because they alter the epistemological foundations of research. Maria wrote to me a couple of months ago because she had read my opinion piece in Aftenposten in which I called for a strong brake on the use of language models in knowledge work. She was part of a committee tasked with developing UiT’s AI strategy and was concerned because there was so much hype and so few members of the committee with actual expertise in AI. I fully support the petition. There are probably some good uses for AI in research, but the uncritical, hype-driven insistence that we must simply adopt it everywhere is highly risky. There are many researchers in Norway with strong expertise in AI, language, ethics, working life, and culture. We must make use of this expertise. This is also partly about respect for research in the humanities, social sciences, psychology, and law. Introducing AI at universities and university colleges is not merely a technical issue, and perhaps not even primarily a technical one. It concerns much more: philosophy of science, methodological reflection, epistemology, writing, publishing, the working environment, and more. […]

screenshot of Grammarly - main text in the middle, names of experts on the left with reccomendations and on the right more info about the expert review feature
AI and algorithmic culture Teaching

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or scholar, they also have been impersonating and offering “feedback” in your name. Until yesterday, when they discontinued the Expert Review feature due to a class action lawsuit. Here are screenshots of how it worked.